The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siege and Fortress[edit]

Siege and Fortress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One decent review (listed in the article), but nothing else could be found (45 Ghits[1], no Gbooks hits). Company has no article, no obvious redirect target available. Fram (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete insufficient WP:RS to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV, fails N Chetsford (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not seeing enough to warrant a pass atWP:NBOOK or GNG. But I'll ping User:Newimpartial, maybe he can dig something up? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.