The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. The consensus is to Keep this article but also that it needs improvement. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russian interference in European politics[edit]

Russian interference in European politics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came across this article when doing research on the Mueller special counsel investigation. The page contains way too many quotations, close paraphrasing and improper use of a non-free source, and overall fails WP:GNG. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 13:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Czech Republic, and Russia. Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 13:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: There's been talk of Russian influence at the European Parliament. I've found a few sources in French [1], [2], [3]. Perhaps we need to re-work the article, but this is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: What, the growing menace of the tyrannical onslaught of Russian destruction potentially threatening all of Europe is not notable?

70.26.38.47 (talk) 02:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: quite clearly there are multiple independent reports of this topic, as well as from primary sources such as the European Parliament [4]. Although sourcing should be improved, needing cleanup is not grounds for deletion. C679 13:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Oaktree b and Cloudz679. There's enough WP:RS-based coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.