The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎Speedy Keep (nomination withdrawn). Eluchil404 (talk) 22:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]

Retro-style automobile[edit]

Retro-style automobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes, retro-styled cars do exist but do we need a list of such? Do we need a list full of unsourced claims? WP:LISTN, WP:EXAMPLEFARM SpacedFarmer (talk) 10:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you may have noticed that I have made significant contributions to this article. I could either add sources to the claims or shorten down the featured list (or do both), or just leave the article for admins to discuss / delete if this article is not needed. Thanks. Mustang208 (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the article with the headings but can you add sources in. Also, I do not think the lists are necessary. SpacedFarmer (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this today while trying to research the Plymouth prowler and it was exactly what I needed, it should definitely stay. It’s an aesthetic phenomenon in car production that was very popular for awhile and still exists today albeit rare. There’s no reason this page shouldn’t exist, and I was sad when I saw the banner saying deleting it was being considered. 72.181.15.133 (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If it's nicely referenced there's no harm in it staying now is there? --Ouro (blah blah) 14:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep. Everything in the list should be sourced (as should everything in Wikipedia). The concept is notable even without the list, and the list itself provides a useful set of examples, if sourced. BD2412 T 01:59, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per references and per additional information beyond the category. gidonb (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination withdrawn, very satisfied with the article as it is given that it passes notability guidelines.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.