The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of SPI games. Randykitty (talk) 15:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ragnarok (board game)[edit]

Ragnarok (board game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. There is an offline review that is used as a reference, but it's only a capsule reviews and article needs multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to List of SPI games. BOZ (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If more sources can't be found, I'm fine with a merge. I didn't notice that the list exited. SL93 (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 01:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 01:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I ran a BEFORE (newspapers.com, JSTOR, Google News, Google Books) which was difficult due to how common Ragnorak is as a name but, insofar as I can tell, there are no RS about this. In the absence of any other sources, we only have a single source in the article and it, therefore, fails GNG. I can't see that it passes WP:NPRODUCT either. I would also be fine with a Redirect to List of SPI games, but not a Merge as the content is not appropriately transferable for a list. Simulations Publications, Inc. is, as an article, itself probably a good candidate for deletion so it shouldn't be merged/redirected there. Chetsford (talk) 08:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • SPI isn't going to get deleted, plenty of sources. And I did find a fair number of reliable sources on this game, including two books that appear to cover the topic in some depth. But they aren't independent. Hobit (talk) 02:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Sorry but the article does not satisfy GNG Alex-h (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to SPI. Hobit (talk) 02:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, should be to List of SPI games. Hobit (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.