The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter J. Burns III[edit]

Peter J. Burns III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cited sources and those that came up in before are non-independent, mostly press releases. The independent sources I found are passing mentions, mostly brief business news announcements or court cases he was involved in. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Connecticut. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we lack the indepth, reliable secondary sources that are indepedent of the subject that we need to build a quality article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.