The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National Chamber of Exporters of Sri Lanka[edit]

National Chamber of Exporters of Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Earlier G11, G12 violation deleted page again recreated. The page earlier deleted with this log: 2014-11-16 07:38 (Jimfbleak): G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.nce.lk/. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 11:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "National Chamber of Exporters of Sri Lanka (NCE) is a national chamber which serves Sri Lankan exporters." The stubbiest stub since St Stubby the Stubby Stub. No content, no notability, nothing to say. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Alexandermcnabb this diff makes a big sense for this nomination. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 12:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  At least you'd want to write a few words for the money you're charging! :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Alexandermcnabb heck. I don't wanna get blocked by doing such. I have never edited any promotion pages. I have a strong belief that the user is a sock and creating pages taking money (tons of such examples in freelancer sites). Their edits in the pages are like doing in a hurry which resulted out several issues. But at the AfD, they change than the page editor one. At all the AfD, they don't sound like a newcomer, but hammers with strong Wiki knowledge which never reflected on page creation. Thus, I suspect a sock as the language and tone of the page creator and the same in AfD are having fast difference. Have you noticed that? _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 13:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I haven't been looking out for a pattern of editing, to be honest, NeverTry4Me. Do I have a vague recollection something around this was mentioned at ANI? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Provide the ANI link please Alexandermcnabb. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 13:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I have no link! Just a vague recollection of something - I wouldn't set any store by my vague recollection! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please don't accuse, I have accepted money. My connection with this institution was, I was a speaker at an event organized by them in 2000. I have sent screenshots of a newspaper and a photo (which published my speech) to ArbCom via email.Eesan1969 (talk) 14:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eesan1969: You must declare COI and UPE which you haven't done yet. Now, as you have admitted that you have clear COI when you say "My connection with this institution was, I was a speaker at an event organized by them in 2000" - that confirms the COI. Please have a look at COI and ask yourself why you are forbidden to create and edit such a page and what to do when you are connected with the subject. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 16:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Sri Lanka. _{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:37, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, the substub article cites three refs, first one is non-indepedent, second one can't be opened (might be my laptop's issue, or is it a dead link?), third one mentions a minor, trivial award. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, which is more demanding than GNG (the latter this also fails). The creator probably has a WP:COI, evident from the disclaimer, that alone isn't a deletion rationle, as it's not enough for CSD under G11, but notability criteria are failed, so delete is definitely suitable. VickKiang (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.