- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Meeples' Choice Award[edit]
- Meeples' Choice Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (awards)/Wikipedia:Notability (websites) requirement. Prodded in the past, deprodded by User:Andy14and16 [1] with "remove prod, completely verifiable" rationale. As far as I can see it, this award, now defunct (?), received no independent, reliable coverage, and survives only through BoardGameGeek wikia, where it belongs - but is way too minor for us. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete An award given out by an internet forum, that only seems to be mentioned (or regurgitated as listicles) on other internet forums and blogs does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG, specifically self-published sources. Most forums merely indicate these awards exist, but mere verifiability does not guarantee an article's retention. --Animalparty-- (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:09, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:09, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG, no independent sources turn up in web searches. Kraxler (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.