The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Luc Thériault (disambiguation)[edit]

Luc Thériault (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No need for dab page until the producer gets his own article, and even then a hatnote would suffice. Brycehughes (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Comment' It would, but what about possible confusion between Pierre-Luc Thériault and the 2 Luc Thériaults? Personally, I'm on the fence. I'm also not sure the producer is someone ever likely to merit/get an article. Boleyn (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • A hatnote per WP:2DABS would work just fine. Brycehughes (talk) 12:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I might be missing it, but I can't see anywhere on WP:2DABS where it talks about using hatnotes when there are three people of the same or similar name, only when there are 2. Boleyn (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • There is no producer article, so he wouldn't get a hatnote entry. Brycehughes (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • Actually, it's Pierre-Luc who doesn't deserve a hatnote mention. Does anybody refer to the Enterprise's captain as "Luc" Picard? I doubt it's any different for the table tennis player. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • Perhaps nobody gets a hatnote. Brycehughes (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A hatnote would do the job. Pierre-Luc is out of luc(k). Clarityfiend (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguation-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  03:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Can possibly be recreated later if Luc Thériault (producer) is made. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.