The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gtech Mulearn[edit]

Gtech Mulearn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of clear notability is evident, although the sources provided are not the worst. BoraVoro (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Technology, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. None of the cited sources is substantial coverage of Gtech Mulearn: they are just promotional announcements of product launches. Also this reference & this one are so similar, with substantial amounts of word-for word identical text and the rest closely paraphrased versions of essentially the same text, that there is no room for any doubt that they are two write-ups of the same press release, and likewise so are this one & this one. This one is full of language such as "... engage the talents in programming, product design, and product making, with the potential to build technology products that can tap the global market...": just blatant marketing material, not independent coverage. In summary, not a single one of the cited references is either substantial coverage of the subject or an independent source, let alone both of those, as needed to establish notability. JBW (talk) 22:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.