The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000). Tone 09:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drukhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No idea why this is not under Dark Eldar, which would be a more common name, but anyway this is beyond fixing. Nothing here suggests this piece of fancruft deserves to stay around. Usual failure of GNG/NFICTION/PLOT with nothing but a PRIMARY source or two. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000) (although I'm not sure that article passes WP:GNG either. But for now that's a good target. Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect. Notability is not established. TTN (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless some decent sources are identified. I don't think I can really support redirect to Eldar. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000). There is material in this article not in the Eldar article, which focuses on playing the game, but don't need two articles. RJFJR (talk) 14:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.