The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Horizon: Escape[edit]

Dark Horizon: Escape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks all notability. Boardgamegeek is a database listing, which leaves us with just one review. Nothing better could be found in the 57 Google hits[1], and after more than 20 years no books seem to have even mentioned it either. Fram (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The review in Dragon appears to be the only legit secondary source. All other sources are either simple database listings (such at the BGG entry currently being used in the article), or sales listings. The single source is not sufficient to pass the WP:GNG. As neither the game's creator or publisher appear to be notable themselves, there is no suitable target for redirecting or merging. Rorshacma (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.