Cannabis Indica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Paisley and the Southern Grass[edit]

Danny Paisley and the Southern Grass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been the source of a significant amount of WP:PROMO and WP:SPAM. I'm wondering now if it even meets notability requirements. Looks like just another run of the mill band to me. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I reverted back to a much more thoroughly-sourced version of the article and added a few references myself. A review of the material in the article, as well as a cursory search online, convinces me that the band meets WP:BAND criteria number 1 (i.e. non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the band). If there is a promotional push being made at the article due to a new lineup then that is a concern that needs to be monitored, but I don't think deletion is the answer in this case.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply