The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coda (board game)[edit]

Coda (board game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not appear to be a notable board game. The article is primarily a description of the rules and is sourced only to BoardGameGeek, a site that aims to list all board games regardless of obscurity. This could probably have been PRODded but, given the difficulty of searching for sources among mountains of unrelated hits, I thought I'd bring it here instead. Reyk _YO! 10:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• There appears to be over 20 reviews listed at [1]. I've not looked at them closely, but we might find some good sources there... Hobit (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with nom this does not pass GNG. Reviews appear to be WP:ROUTINE only. Chetsford (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete haven't found enough coverage for this article or one on Eiji Wakasugi (the creator, who might be a redirect target). power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.