The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to BattleTech#Clans. Stifle (talk) 11:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clans (BattleTech)[edit]

Clans (BattleTech) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no independent sources that indicate the notability of these clans outside of that game universe. There isn't enough to create an article about history and development of the clans by the others or anything of that sort or enough sources to create a list of the individual clans. The separate clan articles have been merged here and suggest a merger of the actually sourced material into BattleTech#Clans (which may be about another paragraph). Ricky81682 (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 20:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak support. Weak, because of sentimental reasons (I contributed to this ages ago), but yes, as written, this fails notability for fictional entities/characters. And while we are at it, we should probably AfD few more entries from {{BattleTech}}. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:31, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge per nominator's suggestion. BOZ (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.