The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chapman Baehler[edit]

Chapman Baehler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I couldn't find any good sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Photography, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP: GNG. Unreliable and not independent. Reads a bit like a resume, WP:Resume & WP:ADMASQ. NiklausGerard (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm not finding enough to substantiate the notability of this photographer per WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. He certainly has photographed and filmed notable people, but the only significant coverage about him that I see is the MTV piece, the rest are simple name-checks, press-releases or social media.Netherzone (talk) 16:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.