The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is consensus that the sources added while the AfD was open show that the subject is notable. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 15:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Moon (game)[edit]

Blue Moon (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-encyclopaedic page about a subject not yet shown to be notable. Expressive101 (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. Dozens of these proprietary games are produced every year; a few win prizes and go on to become notable (Uno being a leading example), but this is not one of them. Bermicourt (talk) 12:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have added excerpts from lengthy reviews found in two large-circulation European magazines which I believe denotes notability. Guinness323 (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Guinness323, meets WP:GNG for notability. BOZ (talk) 00:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per updated sourcing. And, in general, everything by Reiner Knizia is probably notable. Hobit (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.