The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Black Flames[edit]

Black Flames (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced stub which provides basically no information about it's subject. Not a very active user (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unsourced for eight years, a WP:BEFORE search brought up nothing helpful. SportingFlyer T·C 06:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. It certainly isn't unsourced as claimed, as it's a book, which is a source in and of itself. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I don't know where to find an archive of them, but it looks like somebody tried to list a review in White Wolf #38 as a source. Now, one review does not establish notability, but there might be other contemporary reviews in RPG magazines of the era. Rockphed (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 20:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.