The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armorik[edit]

Armorik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There aren't enough known reviews collected for this subject to write a meaningful article. It didn't have a single mention in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets (no list of Infogrames games). If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 14:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 15:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: If you look for "Armorik the Viking" you will find a lot of reviews of this game in almost every abandonware gaming website, either English, French or Russian. Other than those cited in the article, give a look to this: http://www.legendsworld.net/AdventureLegends/1988.htm#9118 http://www.old-games.ru/game/2877.html http://www.uvlist.net/it/game-207121-Les+8+Conquetes+dArmorik+le+Viking

Maybe it's not the most famous games ever, but it's prboably the oldest game (maybe even the first) from Infogrames, a company which just a few years later rose to celebrity with the famous "Alone in the Dark", so it's worth mentioning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daimyo2 (talk • contribs)

Those abandonware sites are unreliable. We only use reviews from reliable sources. You can find a list of vetted video game sources here. czar 12:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I could not find significant coverage in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 04:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lack of good coverage Rainbow unicorn (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.