- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 19:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alcatraz (board game)[edit]
- Alcatraz (board game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable board game. I have not been able to find any significant, direct, detailed coverage of this topic in secondary sources. The PROD-tag was removed without explanation by Colonel Warden (talk · contribs) – which seems rather impolite but no more so than I've come to expect. ╟─TreasuryTag►stannator─╢ 18:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Finnish adult game of the year in 1999. Warden (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Though I obviously don't wish to belittle the magnitude of the Finnish Adult Game of the Year award[sarcasm] the game has to have significant coverage, not simply have won a prize. This isn't WP:ANYBIO we're talking about. ╟─TreasuryTag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 18:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Above award is not notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely WP:OR. No actual sources, just a listing at boardgamegeek.com, a place to sell your old game. A websearch reveals lots of folks selling their old game. Someone see a source for the Finnish game of the year claim? Would serve us better in pagespace. Until better sourcing is found, delete as unsourced OR. BusterD (talk) 13:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.