- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AWplanet[edit]
- AWplanet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to have received any significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources: therefore failing the general notability guidelines. Talk page comment from last year mentions that there may be Russian-language sources. No useful links from the .ru wiki Marasmusine (talk) 09:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Marasmusine (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence by reliable sources that this game is notable. --Izno (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, lack of coverage from reliable sources. Additionally, one of the references within the article that is third party is actually a dead link, thus this lacks any detailed third party references. --Taelus (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.