• Hello Qwertyxp2000:

Please consider participating in this week's vote for TAFI's upcoming Week 17 collaboration. Last week's voting did not receive many participants. Thanks for your consideration. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it is.

As opposed to enterprise users, which do not get the free upgrade through this method. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

This is what I wrote for "Wikipedia is not a tyranny". How would you comment about this? Is this reasonable for WP:WWIN? How can I improve on my analogy?

====Wikipedia is not a tyranny===
{{further|WP:NOTYOU|WP:COI|WP:BADIDEA}}
Wikipedia is not the place to have one user with absolute control over every Wikipedian. Wikipedia is a community and all users including admins discuss with each other their ideas. Not all ideas will be agreed on, however, all ideas must not be straightforwardly disagreed on without any evidence saying why such an idea is not reasonable.

I hope you can be critical in improving my analogy, whilst being non-agressive. Thanks, Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

• Hello Qwertyxp2000:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 18 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Hi Qwertyxp2000: I have reverted the changes you recently made to the week 18 voting section at WT:TAFI. No offense toward you is intended. My intention is to streamline the layout, formatting and processes at the weekly voting, in hopes to encourage more participation. Excessive subsections make the page more complicated than it needs to be, in my opinion, and votes and comments are easily distinguishable in the combined Votes and comments section. Also, I feel that my efforts have significantly contributed to project participation, (Addendum: In addition to other techniques, such as notifying members on their user pages about weekly voting North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)). If I'm not mistaken, last weeks voting received the most participants in the projects's history. I would like to retain the page's present formatting in hopes for this trend of significantly increased participation to continue into the future. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Northamerica1000, I realised that I found it difficult to count the votes correctly. Okay, I get what you mean. Oh yes, that seems better than what I was thinking beforehand. Splitting votes in pieces. Oh yes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your consideration, which is utmostly appreciated. I noted that you prefer a separate voting and comments section, stating in an edit summary that "Sorry, but segregating votes from comments is better. This is so that, when counting the votes, I do not get confused on the difference between the votes and comments". However, the page's layout is benefiting the majority of participants and editors, and I feel that going back to the old format to benefit one user carries significantly less weight. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

The wheel is one of the most famous and useful inventions in the history of technology Hello, Qwertyxp2000. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: History of technology Previous selections: Garbage picking • Antagonist Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Baby i'm a firework, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 02:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Go talk at your talk page. I replied to you. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baby i'm a firework. Since you had some involvement with the Baby i'm a firework redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Qwertyxp2000: Check out new TAFI templates at the bottom of the Automation & templates page, particularly the {{TAFI weekly voting}} one. I designed this to streamline and standardize layout for the weekly voting, and to provide a guide for reference. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qwertyxp2000. Thank you. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

• Hello Qwertyxp2000:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 19 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

A saxophone is an example of an aerophone. Hello, Qwertyxp2000. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Aerophone Previous selections: History of technology • Garbage picking Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

Ah! Finally, a huge break. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

The truth is, I am have not retired Wikipedia. I am just much, much more inactive than I was before. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: Where is my block notice with the sockpuppet blocks? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

My attempt...

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Is that what you might've done? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

A satellite image demonstrating the Geography of Niger Hello, Qwertyxp2000. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Geography of Niger Previous selections: Aerophone • History of technology Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions

@Jtmoon:

@LightandDark2000:

Because I am blocked for socking with an IP (not because I am doing vandalism, nor am I having a Mr Jekyll and Mr Hyde), I have been blocked. So I have worked on adding this information to the Timeline of events related to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Timeline of events related to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

• 20 April: A 18-year-old boy from New Zealand joins ISIL and is reported missing.^[1] New Zealand and Australia are concerned about ISIL-related terrorism at Anzac day.^[2][3][4]

You have been blocked from editing for an extended period of 2 weeks for Block evasion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: So, is this block from this time to two weeks further? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

This user does not want to see this. You may open it for reference, esp. if you are an admin.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Qwertyxp2000/Archives/2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The block is for my negative socking in AfDs and TAFI only. Yes, I was giving an illusion of extra vote power. However, I seem to not be using socking negatively elsewhere, and I admit for socking for vote power. Why did you block me for every page? I was desperate for making a useful edit, which explains my block evasion. Surely only block me from WikiProjects and AfDs? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 8:11 am, Today (UTC+1) Decline reason: You don't get to selectively break the rules, I'm afraid. The very fact that you seem to think this is a legitimate line of appeal suggests to me that you really don't understand Wikipedia's policies at all; I am sorely tempted to increase this to an indefinite block until it's clear that you actually understand how things work on this site. Yunshui 雲水 07:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. @Yunshui: I am very VERY sorry. I am not aiming to hurt anyone. My real intention is to make a better Wikipedia, but have very bad habits of Wikipedia. Seriously, I am only a high school student and am still very naive. Don't scare me to death! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC) I have good faith and in the months before the incidents, I had been editing as a kind editor. Now I am an angry stubborn person due to masses of stress. Every time I edit, I edit with good faith, but it is one bad habit that spoils my reputation and that was socking. Please look at WP:ASSUMEGOODFAITH and WP:AOBF. P.S. I know know how things work on the site and know the rules, but was very stupid and did socking. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Everyone makes mistakes and I admit myself guilty. See the section that says "About good faith". Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)  Done I will be quitting to have a very long break. See my WikiStress level? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

• Hello Qwertyxp2000:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 21 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Hydroelectric dams use hydropower to generate electricity Hello, Qwertyxp2000. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Hydropower Previous selections: Geography of Niger • Aerophone Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions