Image copyright problem with Image:GuyWestBridge.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:GuyWestBridge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Kappa Sigma, Nu Lambda Chapter. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Leuko 21:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- apologies, I wasn't sure how to handle it - I thought I read that was what we were supposed to do. I deleted it and left to do something. By the time I came back the article was already gone. Please restore it so we can discuss further. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jgladding (talk • contribs) .
- Please see my response here. Leuko 21:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
More time?
[edit]I don't understand why you object to the article being deleted too soon. Isn't it better to remove it quickly before anyone's put too much work in it? By long precedant, individual chapters of organizations like this don't get articles, and this particular article was a shining example of why this precedent exists. This is an encyclopedia, whereas you are apparently looking for a group yearbook. If you want to record your chapter's history, great, go ahead, but Wikipedia is not the place for it. Friday (talk) 14:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Greek Row, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've indicated in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issue at Talk:Greek Row. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it will probably still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 13:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Jasonwilliams.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jasonwilliams.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 16:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
main page title
[edit]I heard a rumor that your wondering how to remove the main page title on a personal wiki. Anyways, Wikipedia (along with a bunch of other wikimedia prjects) do it through javascript in Mediawiki:Common.js. Anyways the line you need (I'm pulling this from n:Mediawiki:monobook.js as i'm more familiar with it over there) is
//BEGIN remove Main Page title var mpTitle = "Main Page"; var isMainPage = (/(title=|\/wiki\/)([Tt]alk:|)[Mm]ain[ _][Pp]age/.test(document.location)); var isMainPageFront = (document.title.substr(0, document.title.lastIndexOf(" - ")) == mpTitle); var isDiff = (document.location.search && (document.location.search.indexOf("diff=") != -1 || document.location.search.indexOf("oldid=") != -1)); if (isMainPage && isMainPageFront && !isDiff) { document.write('<style type="text/css">/*<![CDATA[*/ #lastmod, #siteSub, #contentSub, h1.firstHeading { display: none !important; } /*]]>*/</style>'); } //END remove Main Page title
Add that to the end of your wiki's Mediawiki:monobook.js (or perhaps Mediawiki:common.js) and it should get rid of it. If you just want to get rid of it for you, add it to <URL of wiki>/wiki/special:mypage/monobook.js
hope that helps. Bawolff 01:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. that only works for js browsers (virtually every modern/semi-modern browser except for text browsers like lynx, however it almost always is better with a title in lynx anyways, so thats not really an issue. Some users also turn off java-script, so they would still see the title). Bawolff 01:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- your welcome, glad I could help. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. (in future, its probably not a good idea to ask on Talk:Main Page as that's actually the wrong place for this type of thing. technically right place would proablly be at the village pump under technical (potntially, not sure about that) or on the mediawiki mailing list/#mediawiki irc channel (on irc.freenode.net) or somewhere in mediawiki wiki) Bawolff 06:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- yes, well around here (wikinews) its a lot simpler. On wikipedia its complex due to the extreme amount of people there. they have to have lots of rules, or stuff would become over-run. Bawolff 09:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- your welcome, glad I could help. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. (in future, its probably not a good idea to ask on Talk:Main Page as that's actually the wrong place for this type of thing. technically right place would proablly be at the village pump under technical (potntially, not sure about that) or on the mediawiki mailing list/#mediawiki irc channel (on irc.freenode.net) or somewhere in mediawiki wiki) Bawolff 06:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you took out the line beaks and added bullet points in the new template design and was wondering why. Were the lists not rendering correctly at your screen resolution or something? --Dynaflow 23:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- you are correct, sir! It was breaking at all the wrong points. I was on IE7 at the time.
- You must have your screen resolution set to 800x600 or something like that. I put the breaks back in, but in different spots. Take a look at it again and see if it's still screwing up. Also, if you could, see if Template:San Diego State University is doing the same thing. Thanks. --Dynaflow 07:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Looks great now. :)
- Coolness. Thanks. --Dynaflow 18:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello again. I noticed you changed some more of the coding for the template, and I am wondering if the template was displaying wrong again, or if the change was just a matter of taste, or what? In the future, you may want to leave an edit summary so that editors who come after you can tell why you made a particular change without having to come directly to you each time and ask. This is especially important when editing templates, as they are displayed on many, many pages and must render correctly in each one. Also, since my templates are non-standard ones I made from modifying a couple of original designs I built from scratch, a display problem with one template may indicate a problem with many others (Template:California State University, for example, shares a lot of elements "under the hood" with Template:University of California, Berkeley, not to mention the design similarities with direct derivations like Template:University of Hawaii). In any case, let me know what the problem was and how the change you made fixed it so I can see if the same issue exists on my other navboxes. Thanks. --Dynaflow babble 21:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- [Addendum:] If the change you made was due to a display problem, would you mind telling me what operating-system/browser/screen-resolution combination you're using? --Dynaflow babble 21:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- The font was getting "chopped" at the top, I just fixed to a more html friendly code. I am using IE6. The U of Hawaii one has the same problem.
- "Chopped" how? Like, the letters are overflowing the background field or something? Assuming you're using Windows XP or 2000, right click your desktop, go to "Properties," and check what your screen resolution is. It should be in the last tab in the menu box, if I remember correctly. I'm curious what's causing this, and I don't have a Windows machine handy to duplicate it. --Dynaflow babble 22:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- send me your email and I will send a screenshot.
- "Chopped" how? Like, the letters are overflowing the background field or something? Assuming you're using Windows XP or 2000, right click your desktop, go to "Properties," and check what your screen resolution is. It should be in the last tab in the menu box, if I remember correctly. I'm curious what's causing this, and I don't have a Windows machine handy to duplicate it. --Dynaflow babble 22:08, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- The font was getting "chopped" at the top, I just fixed to a more html friendly code. I am using IE6. The U of Hawaii one has the same problem.
Template:Sacramento Valley Sports
[edit]See my post in the talk for the template. Tuyvan 20:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jimmy buffett.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy buffett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:1984allstargame.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:1984allstargame.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 18:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:2007allstargame.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:2007allstargame.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 21:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:CAUSEWAY50a.gif)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:CAUSEWAY50a.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:Rochesterroyals.gif
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/32px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rochesterroyals.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kc-omaha-kings.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Kc-omaha-kings.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miramontehs.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Miramontehs.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
My apologies -- I didn't see that part of your edit, but merely the extraneous text (probably erroneously) left in front of the section headline that killed the headline. In reverting to remove that error, I missed the other part of the edit. I'll add that part back in -- thanks for pointing it out! :) Ashdog137 16:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:BOLOGNABOWL-big.gif listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BOLOGNABOWL-big.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Please consider removal of the Telegram Image from the article on Telex
[edit]I was about to remove the image that is not , in my opinion, relavant to Telex.
However, I wanted to hear your reason for the addition. Can you please explain?
I worked in Telex, with Western Union, for a number of years and can state that the Telegram service (POO) and Telex were not related. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wa3frp (talk • contribs) 03:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for Image:WesternunionTelegram.jpg
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Copyright-excl.svg/70px-Copyright-excl.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:WesternunionTelegram.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:SAC 20.gif)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:SAC 20.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:TBRowdies.gif)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:TBRowdies.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:WesternunionTelegram.jpg
[edit]![File Copyright problem](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:WesternunionTelegram.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Prairie-City-Overlay.png
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Prairie-City-Overlay.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Kappa Sigma and the Italian Order
[edit]Please see Talk:Kappa Sigma. The inclusion of that information has been discussed and the information is considered to be well referenced (both to the 1898 Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities) and early issues of the Caduceus. If you have any information that has not been covered, please start a new discussion on the talk page.Naraht (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kappa Sigma, you may be blocked from editing. You e been told about this before. Please stop deleting it. Doug Weller talk 21:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jgladding. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cerro Gordo, California
[edit] Hello, Jgladding. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cerro Gordo, California, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)