Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:GrapheneOS, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your addition here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GrapheneOS#Recent_changes_and_WP:NPOV was out of place, and appears to be intended to cause confusion. Please make an effort to organize discussions and place them in appropriate sections. Also, removing citations without valid reasoning regarding "reliability" seems disruptive. In the case of Cellular News, however, pending further checking, I agree it looks questionable on the surface. Yae4 (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have zero intentions on "causing confusion" and suddenly jumping to such a conclusion doesn't really appear to be you trying to WP:AGF and assume I'm somehow trying to cause issues. It would be nice if you could come at me with a less demeaning tone. As for the reasoning I put a semi-related discussion in that section, the original edit I was trying to bring up (Special:Diff/1096514055) mentioned it is attempting "to address WP:NPOV" indicating that there must be an active talk on the neutrality of the article, but I could not find an active one that mentions WP:NPOV within the past 30 days. If there is one, please correct me. But from what I'm seeing all the "POV debates" are more so about the CalyxOS and Bromite situations, something I do not want to be apart of and I hope you can understand why I would not like to get involved and I am not very sure what relevance they have to the "history of GrapheneOS" because the projects appear to be operating perfectly fine regardless of these situations.

On another note, I'm looking at all your edits about GrapheneOS and they do not look very neutral and (as a new reader) are giving me a negative tone about GrapheneOS which should certainly not be the point of the article regardless of what "Micay" is doing in your eyes. I do not know anything about GrapheneOS or CalyxOS or Bromite or Vanadium (browsers vs Android ROMs?) and from my reading this felt very awkward to read. A reader should not have to spend so much time figuring out what this CalyxOS-Bromite-Vanadium-GrapheneOS situation is (WP:OR). I'm trying to assume good faith (like you should be doing here) that your edits are not trying to cause issues (like you supposedly claim I am doing when I am completely new here) and hope that we can have a discussion about this but your talks have been very negative and hostile to people, specifically towards 84.250.14.116, and are very confusing to follow. And this appears to have been an issue of somekind for over a year now. I believe a WP:Administrator should intervene the GrapheneOS page and resolve all these talks and personal conflicts that I am struggling to follow because I do not appreciate your tone to a newcomer here. I see you have made a post on the Admin Noticeboard[1] about 84.250.14.116 but I think an admin needs to resolve everything here. EndariV (talk) 18:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion whether particular sources are reliable or self-published in context at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#heise.de (heise online / Heinz Heise) / c't (c't 3003) that may be of interest to you. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1099613067 may be possible to interpret as edit warring. After consideration to undo you for the edit summary and the assumption that editors must assume good faith, I won't. WP:BRD. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The behavior has been noted at ANEW, FYI.[2] -- Yae4 (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]