Hi Elenaparker123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elenaparker123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Rajan Mahtani for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elenaparker123, The page Dr. Rajan Mahtani does not sound encyclopedical, but promotional. It does not matter that the information is taken from the news sources. Please, re-work it to be encyclopedical, otherwise it still stays as candidate to be deleted. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Please also read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dr. Rajan Mahtani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Skipper Home Fashions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 13:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You said, "Having a Wikipedia page will allow the people to know about Skipper Home Fashions in detail and the type of product and services that it offers.". You can do that on Facebook or blogspot or places like that. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and we ask that notability be shown (WP:CORP for companies, and this must be proved with reliable independent sources WP:RS. Peridon (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elenaparker123. You have new messages at Peridon's talk page.
Message added 10:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Peridon (talk) 10:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ILS Hospitals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dolescum (talk) 06:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajan Mahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajan Mahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BenLinus1214^talk 18:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jeraphine Gryphon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rajan Mahtani because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You can't just replace all links with a single website. (Also we don't use titles like "Dr." and "Mr." in articles.) — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajan Mahtani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sarfaraz Baig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only secondary source claim of notability falls under WP:1E. Otherwise non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Agtx (talk) 00:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Issues about biography and notability is being highlighted for deletion. I would like to inform that Dr. Sarfaraz Jalil Baig is the First surgeon in the world to conduct a laparoscopic adrenalectomy on a three-month old baby. The factual correctness of this statement can be justified by going through this link - http://www.theindependentbd.com/magazine/details/12900.

Apart from that, only real information has been imparted through the article. The secondary links used in the article supports and justifies every fact. Hence, categorizing the article under "Promotion of subject in a subjective manner" and "Notability for Biography" is probably not appropriate.

Thanks for uploading File:Goodwyn Tea.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dr. Manish Joshi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Manish Joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Manish Joshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mduvekot (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarfaraz Baig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarfaraz Baig until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 08:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elenaparker123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, My account has been blocked stating multiple account usage however I manage all my contributions from one single account. Have been a user since 4 yrs contributing to Wikipedia kindly unblock the account so i can review all the issues with my contributions and rectify them as per reviewer Elenaparker123 (talk) 07:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clearly part of a wider spam farm of accounts. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.