Here are my responses from Talk:Zbrojovka Z 4/GA1

• 1: done
• 2: changed "2750" in lead/lede to "2,750"
• 3: I assume you want me to do this "In the early 1930s, Zbrojovka Brno produced the Z 9 type, a car which sales results did not meet expectations."

CosXZ (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so those were only minor concerns. But I'll give you some other things I have a problem with:

• the lead is a bit short, maybe make it as big as this article's lead section or shorter.
• second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile ==> second year of the Czechoslovak 1,000 mile
• debuted in April 1933 at the Prague motor show . ==> debuted in April 1933 at the Prague Motor Show.

I will have more comments. 750h+ 13:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gog! feels great! 750h+ 13:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, 750h+! The article you nominated, Aston Martin DB9, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fn bjf ekjglrqjhwgtbr hjdf gu GOG I CAN Triutbe4ot4oig5wrkjgnbt YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 750h+ 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

!!!!!!!!!! congrats on the FA! keep it up! > Tesseractic: talk? ✎ 18:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :)!! 750h+ 00:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	GA noms usually take a long time. Honestly, I think I have only seen once an article that skipped GAN and went directly to FA status. You’ve got some courage to do that lol, especially without peer review. 48JCL (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much 48JCL! This is my second FAC too! 750h+ 23:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, do you plan in the near future to bring Botswana to FA, @48JCL:? The article in question has been promoted by the way. 750h+ 11:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+:, yes definitely. 48JCL TALK 12:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 750h+. Not to bother you, but it has been more than a week since your last comments from this FAC. Is there more coming? — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 07:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oops, i forgot about this. will continue either today or tommorow 750h+ 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

actually i've left some comments there 750h+ 07:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+ I have assessed your FA nomination for the Lagonda Taraf and am hopeful it will soon be promoted to FA-class. I trust that Catherine's article will make for an excellent read and look forward to addressing your comments on its FAC. Your timely review would be greatly appreciated. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I should take a look at it in a few hours 750h+ 07:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+ Thanks for your comments at Catherine's FAC yesterday. While I am still awaiting comments from other experienced editors I have reached out to, do you have any further suggestions for the article? If yes, please do let me know. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. 750h+ 13:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewers Award
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

o thanks Gog! very much appreciated!

750h+ 22:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, 750h+! The article you nominated, Aston Martin Rapide, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yess finally after over a month! 750h+ 00:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping you would also do Honda Civic. 2001:4455:36D:9100:552D:78F2:AAA5:9FAA (talk) 11:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably won’t. That article’s in a pretty poor state 750h+ 13:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's much better I post here. It seems like you already have the GAN Review Tool script saved. It works on mobile device browsers. I didn't realize it was the reason why. Hopefully this helps for future reviews as well. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i do have it saved, but it’s not working on safari. I’ll try Google. 750h+ 01:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. No worries then. No rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I've promoted it. Sorry about that 750h+ 01:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all. No apologies needed. I didn't mean to rush. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you take a look at this article at FAC and provide some comments? Thanks, Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 15:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I can take a look at it in a bit. 750h+ 15:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 18:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O honoured to be granted this.

750h+ 17:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, 750h+! The article you nominated, Lagonda Taraf, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article General Motors EV1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @750h+, and how are you doing? I was thinking if you can take a look at this FC. Even if you don't have time now, feel free to pass by when you are free. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure i can in a bit. 750h+ 10:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+, I am sorry and not as if to say you are entitled to review, but I haven't heard from you. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 4 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am pleased to inform you that I have finally found the time and wherewithal to record the DB9 article. The recording has been added to the article. Cheers M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much M4V3R1CK32! I do apologise if this did inconvenience you. 750h+ 01:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all! I just had some stuff come up in real space that kept me from recording for a while. I appreciate the suggestion. Drop me a note on my Talk if there are other articles you'd like me to record in the future. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 03:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much! 750h+ 03:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		For your numerous GA reviews, helpful comments, and constructive criticisms! Phlsph7 (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much Phlsph, i am honoured to receive this! 750h+ 08:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

I came to thank you for a GA review, and it fits here ;) - I remember today Bach's 1724 cantata for this Sunday which is unusual in many respects. - A woman's article needs attention for RD, Marina Kondratyeva. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She's on the Main page now. My story today is - because of the anniversary of the premiere OTD in 1782 - about Die Entführung aus dem Serail, opera by Mozart, while yesterday's was - because of the TFA - about Les contes d'Hoffmann, opera by Offenbach. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 750h+, you removed discussions from Talk:Angelina Jolie without explanation. This is a violation of WP:TALKO.

You may have had your reasons for removing those comments, but nevertheless it is a generally bad idea to do this. If you really want to get these off the talk page, I would suggest changing the {{User:MiszaBot/config}} parameter from |minthreadsleft = 4 to |minthreadsleft = 1 until those threads are archive, then switching it back to |minthreadsleft = 4. Peaceray (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peaceray, they removed spam links. I would advise 750h+ however to use edit summaries more often. — 48JCL 22:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would have used {{Uw-delete1}}, but 750h+ is an experienced editor, so I let WP:DONTTEMPLATE prevail. However, that seems to be a mistake, as 750h+ continues to neglect the edit summary. I guess it is time for {{Uw-editsummary2}}. Peaceray (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Ryan Sampson as it relied on Rotten Tomatoes, which is generally not considered reliable for biographical information. Please see WP:ROTTENTOMATOES for details. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 01:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 23:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 750h+, I was wondering whether you might be interested in commenting on the FA nomination of the article Ethics given your familiarity with the article from your GA review. I'm sure there are also other things that demand your attention so please feel under no obligation if now is not a good time. If you need help sometime with reviewing something then please let me know. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I can absolutely take a look! 750h+ 12:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great, thanks a lot for taking the time! Phlsph7 (talk) 12:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@750h+ Hope you are doing well. Given your previous role as a content reviewer for Catherine's article, I thought it would be only appropriate for me to extend an invitation for you to join the article's peer review discussion before its sent to FAC for a second time. The article has been modified a lot in terms of its prose and sourcing since the FAC and any further suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to your response and anticipating our future collaborations. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 10:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take a look at it in a bit. 750h+ 11:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]