This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 24 December 2011 by reviewer Chzz (talk· contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Epilepsy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of epilepsy and epileptic seizures on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EpilepsyWikipedia:WikiProject EpilepsyTemplate:WikiProject EpilepsyEpilepsy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
These (EEG) patterns appear to be generally inheritable, with similar spectral profiles for monozygotic twins, and have been proposed as endophenotypes
The underlying EEG variance is almost totally predicted by the endophenotypes
So in other words, when I classify roses into red, white and yellow, the underlying flower color is almost totally predicted by my classification? Someone needs to clean this up to remove the patent nonsense. 24.205.239.229 (talk) 21:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's time to clean this up a little. --IcyEd (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is much better than it was, although it is still missing citations and other references. After much thought I deleted the original references list as it was next to useless. --IcyEd (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]