![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
original research tag
[edit]Mhare, it looks like I reverted this edit and this edit just now. The article is indeed described as original scientific research, but it's part of a published journal, hence there's a presumption that journal editors reviewed it before publishing. Internally, that article references the next sentence after the disputed one to an earlier 2009 article by the same author, published in a different publication, and in turn articles from other authors from 1970, 1983, 2000. This makes it likely to be a secondary source. You should probably address any issues with this source separately. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have no objections. It's on me. Regards. Mhare (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)