Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 02:59, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   "the album's second single" - I'd add what the first single was in the lead and the body

   • I do not think that it is necessary to put it in the lead and the body. If a reader is interested in reading about the other singles or more about the album, they can click on the link to the album. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   I think the quote by Garrett is a bit much. The first 3 sentences in particular ("Nas is probably one of the coolest cats I've ever met. He's just so laid back. He's a really cool guy so it was dope.") I'd tone it down a bit, probably to the point where it doesn't need to be within a quote box anymore.

   • Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   I think I can guess what a 'club burner' is (though not 100% sure), but what is a "rap joint" and what is "space-age hip hop"? Maybe I'm just not gangsta enough but I have don't know what this actually says about the song itself. Can you give any more specific descriptions of the song's composition and lyrics?

   • I have removed the quotes. Unfortunately, I believe that I have already exhausted all of the sources about the song in general, including the composition and lyrics. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   Should kink be wikilinked to Kink (sexual)?

   • Linked. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   You need to say what publication Sal Cinquemani is writing in.

   • Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   Credits and Personnel needs a source. Perhaps Allmusic?

   • Thank you for catching this. I can't believe that I forgot that. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Can you find any coverage of the song being performed live?

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks pretty good. Placing on hold until issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 08:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   • @Freikorp: Thank you for the review. I believe that I have addressed everything. Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

   • Looks good. Happy to pass this now. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 08:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]