Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we at least have a clear summary up the top what the dispute is all about? I doubt anyone wants to wade through this badly disorganised page to work out what happened here. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 08:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
Can we at least have a clear summary up the top what the dispute is all about? I doubt anyone wants to wade through this badly disorganised page to work out what happened here. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 08:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
Good point. I'm recused from this case, but if I were not I'd say that {{user|FeloniousMonk}}, {{user|Jim62sch}}, {{user|Duncharris}} and others say that Agapetos angel has been editing [[Jonathan Sarfati]] disruptively without disclosing a close personal relationship with |
Good point. I'm recused from this case, but if I were not I'd say that {{user|FeloniousMonk}}, {{user|Jim62sch}}, {{user|Duncharris}} and others say that Agapetos angel has been editing [[Jonathan Sarfati]] disruptively without disclosing a close personal relationship with Sarfati. She, supported to some extent by Kim Bruning and myself, claim that their conduct amounts to harassment. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 16:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:54, 24 February 2006
Can we at least have a clear summary up the top what the dispute is all about? I doubt anyone wants to wade through this badly disorganised page to work out what happened here. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Good point. I'm recused from this case, but if I were not I'd say that FeloniousMonk (talk · contribs), Jim62sch (talk · contribs), Duncharris (talk · contribs) and others say that Agapetos angel has been editing Jonathan Sarfati disruptively without disclosing a close personal relationship with Sarfati. She, supported to some extent by Kim Bruning and myself, claim that their conduct amounts to harassment. --Tony Sidaway 16:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)