Grandmaster (talk | contribs) |
Grandmaster (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 332: | Line 332: | ||
{{u|Rosguill}}, please note that I only cited epress.am once, at the talk page of Agdam. I made no further reference to that source. Every other mention was in response to Armatura, explaining the purpose of that single mention. Also, the article was not nationalist, quite the contrary, it was critical of those people who made racist comments about Azerbaijani people and justified destruction of Azerbaijani cities. I never proposed to use it as a reference in the Wikipedia article. |
{{u|Rosguill}}, please note that I only cited epress.am once, at the talk page of Agdam. I made no further reference to that source. Every other mention was in response to Armatura, explaining the purpose of that single mention. Also, the article was not nationalist, quite the contrary, it was critical of those people who made racist comments about Azerbaijani people and justified destruction of Azerbaijani cities. I never proposed to use it as a reference in the Wikipedia article. |
||
Regarding epress.am, it is certainly not a nationalist publication. Some information about them could be found here [https://hrantdink.org/en/host-organisations-2020-21/2276-independent-journalists-network-ngo-epress-am-news] [https://www.ned.org/region/eurasia/armenia-2018/] And here is an interview with its chief editor, who says that his publication is against nationalism, militarism, homophobia and violence. [https://ru.ejo.ch/novie-media/epress-am-protiv] If you check English Wikipedia, it is used a lot in Armenia related articles. |
Regarding epress.am, it is certainly not a nationalist publication. Some information about them could be found here [https://hrantdink.org/en/host-organisations-2020-21/2276-independent-journalists-network-ngo-epress-am-news] [https://www.ned.org/region/eurasia/armenia-2018/] And here is an interview with its chief editor, who says that his publication is against nationalism, militarism, homophobia and violence. [https://ru.ejo.ch/novie-media/epress-am-protiv] It Won [[Free Media Awards]] in 2014. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Media_Awards#2014] If you check English Wikipedia, it is used a lot in Armenia related articles. |
||
{{u|ZaniGiovanni}}: |
{{u|ZaniGiovanni}}: |
Revision as of 15:15, 24 January 2022
Saad Arshad Butt
Temporarily closing without comment on the merits, and without prejudice to bring up the same diffs in a future filing if the issues resurface. No admins have commented in over a week, it seems the editor has stopped editing, for now. This should not be seen as a "no action" close, but rather a pause in enforcement by an uninvolved admin, which can be taken up at a later date if needed. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. Request concerning Saad Arshad Butt
n/a
IPA notification, BLP notification
Diffs #10 and #11 are the most damning. Per this, the editor is associated with Saad Hussain Rizvi, and even offers to provide his ID documents to prove a date of birth. The editor identifies as Saad Arshad on their userpage, if required I can provide a social media link proving someone of that name is a member of the political party Saad Hussain Rizvi is in charge of. They are also editing while logged out, the minimal difference between the IP's version and Saad Arshad Butt's version isn't likely to be a coincidence.
Discussion concerning Saad Arshad ButtStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by Saad Arshad ButtStatement by TrangaBellamThere are 90+ "Arshad Butt" profiles in Linkedin .... TrangaBellam (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Statement by Jehochman
Statement by (username)Result concerning Saad Arshad Butt
|
Lokeshwaran V R
Indef blocked as a standard admin action. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below. Request concerning Lokeshwaran V R
n/a
The user has a long history of not abiding to the naming conventions. See move log. The talk page is full of warnings and discussions on this particular topic: WP:COMMONAME, Article title, Article moves, December 2021, Page moves. Almost all of the moves, if not every, doesn't have a move summary as to why the move is made by the user. This long-lasting moves against the naming policy suggests the user has no understanding the policy itself. I'd request an indefinite move ban within the topics of India, broadly construed.
Discussion concerning Lokeshwaran V RStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by Lokeshwaran V RStatement by (username)Result concerning Lokeshwaran V R
|
Cygnis insignis
96 hour block for 1RR and personal attacks. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Request concerning Cygnis insignis
31 October 2010 Toddst1 ask me, no sanctions or topic bans on this or any other pages. ~ cygnis insignis 22:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
I am not sure if 1RR violation alone would justify this request, but the comments and behavior by this user are highly confrontational, including diffs 3 and 4 above and their removal of comments made by other contributors [2], removing their own signature [3], edit warring about tag date (diffs 1 and 2) etc.
Here [4]
Discussion concerning Cygnis insignisStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator. Statement by Cygnis insignisI did restore that, noting the warning about 1rr within 24 hours above the edit window and reckoned that I hadn't. I then mentioned this in an active discussion on the tag, those opposing its presence also objected to an indication of how long synth concerns had existed (which spun off to two or three sections as things do on that talk). After a substantive period of time, with no further edits to that page by me, the user thought to undertake a sanction process. I am also currently involved in discussion with this account on the Abortion article's talk page, where their concerns are as creepy and bizarre as their username. And how are you? Have a lovely day, wont you? ~ cygnis insignis 22:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Statement by (username)Result concerning Cygnis insignis
|
in re Sushant Singh Rajput
Protected talk page as a standard admin action. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Request concerning Sushant Singh Rajput
This is a very unorthodox request, to be sure, but the situation is such that the alternative is just spamming RFPP every few months and the standard AE template is of absolutely no use to me. I'm seeking to make the current 500/30 on Sushant Singh Rajput · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] - presently set to expire in 2024 - indefinite and to likewise indefinitely semi-protect the talk page of the article. Since Rajput died by hanging in June 2020 the article's been facing cyclical disruption from drive-by IP editors who are pushing conspiracy theories, fed mainly by right-wing Indian media, that he was murdered by his girlfriend or someone else who was/is part of either of their inner circles. (Reliable sources report that it was suicide, based on the initial autopsy and a review of that autopsy.) Every time the article proper is unprotected, IPs/unregistered users quickly come in and reintroduce content in support of this conspiracy theory. The issue is less pronounced on the talk page but still present, in that every few months we get a surge of drive-by IPs demanding we add the conspiracy theory material in meritless edit requests, ignoring an FAQ written and pinned at the top of the page. Because of the nature of the disruption, editor-level sanctions are not viable as an option to stem the tide, since the IPs make their edit and never show up again, making sanctioning them directly moot. While content about Rajput specifically will lose BLP protections in June, there is no guarantee that the conspiracymongering - which, again, focuses on people who are still alive - will stop at that point, especially given Rajput's family members have stirred the pot a couple of times, triggering another surge every time. Again, I apologise for the grossly nonstandard template, but it is not built to request page-level sanctions in a situation where the users themselves are drive-bys. Discussion concerning Sushant Singh RajputStatement by (username)Result concerning Sushant Singh Rajput
|
Devesh.bhatta
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below.
Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Request concerning Devesh.bhatta
- User who is submitting this request for enforcement
- Hemantha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 08:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- User against whom enforcement is requested
- Devesh.bhatta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Search CT alerts: in user talk history • in system log
- Sanction or remedy to be enforced
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan
- Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
- On Conversion of non-Hindu places of worship into temples
- Source (my bolding) -
"... Mughal ruler Babur who ordered its construction in 1500s. Hindu tradition maintains that the mosque was built on the site of a Hindu temple destroyed by the Mughals
- Source (my bolding) -
- This and this on Ajmer rape case : Version before these edits had a single weakly referenced mention of accused belonging to the clan of caretakers of the Moinuddin Chishti Dargah (shrine).
- Source only says
Officials privately admit ... as many of the accused belonged to the influential "khadim" (caretaker) families of the dargah
(of Moinuddin Chishti), as do all others available.
- Source only says
- Their two edits (my bolding) -
Main accused Farooq Chishtee was descendant of Moinuddin Chishti
- Their two edits (my bolding) -
- On Tablighi Jamaat - bulldozing of source's very careful, nuanced wording to imply link between Jamaat and covid spread. One sentence added as is from the source.
- Source
An increasing number of people in Kyrgyzstan are calling on the government to review its policy on religious organizations and learn more about the activities of Tablighi Jamaat
- Edit
Kyrgyzstani People called on the government to ban Tablighi Jamaat.
- Source
- If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts)
- Alerted by another user on 2021-12-12
- Additional comments by editor filing complaint
The listed instances are just from this past month after DS notice was given. There is more instances of reckless sourcing from before for which I had, politely and later forcefully, asked them to be more careful. There was no response or an attempt at cleanup, but they have also not tried to restore my reverts yet. But their slow edit war at Krishna Janmasthan Temple Complex and a continued misrepresentation of sources show that their contributions in this topic area are to push a POV, not to improve articles.
- Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested
Notice_of_Arbitration_Enforcement_noticeboard_discussion
Discussion concerning Devesh.bhatta
Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.
Statement by Devesh.bhatta
Statement by (username)
Result concerning Devesh.bhatta
- This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.
- I dropped a link to WP:Communication is required on his talk page. This is one of those cases that really needs the named party to participate so we can understand why they are making the edits being made. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- The report outlines significant problems. Dennis Brown's message (diff) at User talk:Devesh.bhatta was at 11:36, 23 January 2022. If there is no response from Devesh.bhatta within 72 hours (that is, by 11:36, 26 January 2022), there should be an India-Pakistan topic ban, broadly construed. Devesh.bhatta may not resume editing by that deadline but this report should not be put on hold for a protracted period. Johnuniq (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with User:Johnuniq's suggestion. Not responding shouldn't be a way to escape sanction. Doug Weller talk 10:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Grandmaster
This request may be declined without further action if insufficient or unclear information is provided in the "Request" section below.
Requests may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs (not counting required information), except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Request concerning Grandmaster
- User who is submitting this request for enforcement
- Armatura (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 20:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- User against whom enforcement is requested
- Grandmaster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Search CT alerts: in user talk history • in system log
- Sanction or remedy to be enforced
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2
- Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
- 19:49, 16 January 2022 pushes outrageous website EPRESS.AM to prove his point that "even Armenian media makes analogies with nuclear weapons" for Agdam. The fact the "article" does not even have an author, that it is copy paste of unknown person's delusionary Facebook post, that it contains passages like "nomadic barbarian-vampires" and "they deserve this, I have f****d the city and the Turks' mother" about Azerbaijanis and that the whole website is a trash can with no editorial oversight or domain registration details, full of extreme profanity like "caught when jerking" or "I'd f***ed your mothers" does not worry Grandmaster. He does not want to hear, and keeps beating the dead horse again and again, and once again in ANI, by saying he just “quoted epress.am just to show that the analogy with devastation by nuclear weapons is used by Armenian media too.” , then accusing me for “making so much drama over one news link posted at a talk page, and bringing it to this board.” Such an "article" with racial remarks towards Azeris/Turks would not be normally tolerated another time, yet since it supports his “even Armenian media uses Hiroshima” POV, he isn’t bothered.
- 17:02, 16 January 2022 Grandmaster turns a blind eye on pro-Azeri propaganda; he won't see why Azerbaijani president's aid Hikmet Hajijev's "this is Hiroshima" phrase applied to literally all cities damaged in 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, in front of BBC camera, constitutes propaganda; on the contrary, he justifies it by saying it is because every settlement in 7 districts that were under Armenian occupation "looks like Hiroshima... What is propaganda here?"... and "BBC report shows the town of Jabrayil that looks like another, smaller Hiroshima".
- 13 January 2022Grandmaster uses double standards, putting undue weight on "Armenianness" of the source, giving it undue weight, by downplaying Armenian village head's quote about Azeri president origin despite it was cited by neutral RS", or overplaying it like in Epress.am example above, depending on what better suits POV-pushing.
- Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any
- En Wiki block log previous 10 blocks in English Wikipedia, mostly in AA topic
- Ru Wiki block log previous 10 blocks in Russian Wikipedia, again mostly in AA topic
- 29 May 2010 RU AE case - 6-month ban on Russian Wikipedia for leading the meatpuppetry Anti-Armenian group of a dozen Azerbaijani editors, some of which still support Grandmaster in discussions on English Wikipedia.
- If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see WP:AC/DS#Awareness and alerts)
- Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above.
- Additional comments by editor filing complaint
Grandmaster has veteran experience of POV-pushing with extensive history of blocks in Armenia-Azerbaijan topic in two Wikipedias. The provided diffs are just a few recent examples to show he has not changed but learned how to avoid bans by WP:CPUSH-ing as shown in diffs above. I think he is there not as much as to build encyclopedia, but to advance official Azerbaijan' positions on Wikipedia, in a nationalist mood, prohibited by WP:ADVOCACY. He is apparently unable contribute neutrally in topics he has ethnic conflict of interest with, hence I believe a topic ban from AA area, broadly construed (including Turkey and Turkic world), for at least 1 year, is required to help to sober him up, while allowing him to edit in topics he does not have conflict of interest with. I was advised by admins Rosguill and Robert McClenon to take the case from ANI to AE, and so I did.
- Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested
Notified on talk page by standart alert.
Discussion concerning Grandmaster
Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.
Statement by Grandmaster
This is already 4th report filed on me by Armatura. Such persistence in filing frivolous reports one after another indicates that this user is engaged in WP:Witchhunt. Previously Armatura joined now banned user Steverci to accuse me of various things, but that report was dismissed as retaliatory. [5] Then he filed a 3RR report on me [6], which was dismissed without action, and he did it when I reported a banned IP user, so it appears to be another retaliatory report. After that he filed a report on WP:ANI, asking to ban me: [7] So this is the report # 4, which for the most part repeats the report at WP:ANI.
Regarding Agdam, one can see that Armatura started the latest discussion by bringing up a BBC report that has no relevance to the city of Agdam, to support his claim that the term "Hiroshima of Caucasus" is used as propaganda by Azerbaijan (BBC says nothing like that, btw). But as was demonstrated by myself and other users, the term Hiroshima of Caucasus is used not just by Azerbaijan, but it was coined by British journalist and political analyst Thomas de Waal, and is used by mainstream international media such as Euronews, France24, AP, The independent, and even Armenian reporter for IWPR. I quoted epress.am just to show that the analogy with devastation by nuclear weapons is used by Armenian media too. I did not propose to include it into the article. In fact, Armatura's claiming that the term Hiroshima of Caucasus is propaganda after it was demonstrated that it originated outside of Azerbaijan and is used by media all over the world is tendentious editing in itself.
Then he accuses me of removing claims of an village head about late president of Azerbaijan allegedly concealing his place of birth for political reasons, but how qualified is a villager to make judgements about the motives of the Soviet leadership? Even if it is reported by a reliable source, it does not make the claims of a man in the street reliable or notable. But I only removed that line once, and when Armatura restored it, I left it at that. There was no edit war, or anything of the kind. I just tried to attract attention to questionability of that claim, per WP:BRD.
Regarding my blocks in en:wiki, as you can see, they are from 15 years ago, and incident at Russian wiki is from 12 years ago, and has nothing to do with en:wiki.
Per WP:Boomerang, I think the admins need to look at Armatura's own activity. Armatura repeatedly violated WP:AGF and WP:Civil, making personal attacks and incivil comments every time I try to have a polite discussion with him. For example, in his report at WP:ANI, he accuses me of having a "narrow vision in which Armenians are "the bad guys"", which clearly is a bad faith assumption. In this report here, he accuses me of "advancing official Azerbaijan' positions on Wikipedia, in a nationalist mood", with no credible evidence whatsoever, which is again not in line with WP:AGF. How civil is it to write to another editor: do not test the patience of other editors with nonsense, it may be viewed as trolling? Here he told me: Because you simply refuse to understand when I explain anything, in a nihilistic fashion Bad faith assumption like this, when he accused me of not reacting to another user's erroneous closure of RFC, even though Armatura was explained by a Wikipedia admin that he cannot hold against someone not doing something: [8] Another bad faith assumption at the same page: [9] Here he demands from me "repentance", which he would "perhaps accept"? [10] As was noted by an uninvolved user at WP:ANI, Armatura WP:BLUDGEONs the discussion by arguing with my every vote and every comment, [11]. You may wish to check Talk:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement and Talk:Agdam#RfC_for_"Hiroshima_of_Caucasus" to get the full picture of my interactions with this user.
Previously, Armatura was placed on interaction ban with another user: [12].
In sum, Armatura has difficulties with keeping it cool when engaging in discussions with other editors, which is why admins may wish to see if editing such a contentious topic as Armenia-Azerbaijan relations is something that he should be allowed to do. His behavior creates nervous and unhealthy atmosphere, when you expect to be attacked for everything that you do (or don't do) or write.
Rosguill, please note that I only cited epress.am once, at the talk page of Agdam. I made no further reference to that source. Every other mention was in response to Armatura, explaining the purpose of that single mention. Also, the article was not nationalist, quite the contrary, it was critical of those people who made racist comments about Azerbaijani people and justified destruction of Azerbaijani cities. I never proposed to use it as a reference in the Wikipedia article.
Regarding epress.am, it is certainly not a nationalist publication. Some information about them could be found here [13] [14] And here is an interview with its chief editor, who says that his publication is against nationalism, militarism, homophobia and violence. [15] It Won Free Media Awards in 2014. [16] If you check English Wikipedia, it is used a lot in Armenia related articles.
- 1st diff, which should be this, Billion was quoted by France24, a major French news outlet. [17] I used this quote on OSCE Minsk Group, not Armenian genocide. If France24 considers him a leading French expert on OSCE Minsk Group, I don't see why we cannot quote him.
- 2nd diff, I trimmed a large unnecessary quote, most of which was about Lezgins, and I kept only the part that was about Talysh, because the article is about Talysh, not Lezgins. The only info about Talysh there was that their number could be understated, and that remained.
- 3rd diff, I only provided official Azerbaijani position on that issue. Whether that position is right or wrong, it needs to presented too, per WP:Balance. We cannot write an article without reflecting the official position of one of the warring sides, with proper attribution, which I made. Grandmaster 08:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Statement by Dennis Brown
Grandmaster, you are over the word limit by over 100 words. You need to trim it down a bit if you expect to reply again. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, will do. Grandmaster 01:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is it ok now, or more trimming needed? Grandmaster 01:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- If you look above, the limit is supposed to be 500 words total, which is often overlooked if you don't push it too far, but just be aware, that's all. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks a lot. Grandmaster 13:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- If you look above, the limit is supposed to be 500 words total, which is often overlooked if you don't push it too far, but just be aware, that's all. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is it ok now, or more trimming needed? Grandmaster 01:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Statement by ZaniGiovanni
Since the ANI discussion, I was thinking wheter the suggested AE case would be opened or not, as there are other diffs of Grandmaster's POV pushing that weren't discussed. I believe as an involved party with the previous case, I should add my input. Some recent edits by Grandmaster that I believe weren't posted in either of noticeboards:
- diff 1 - Grandmaster adds Didier Billion as a source which supports Azerbaijani point-of-view. Billion is an Armenian genocide denier, (link). Billion trivializes genocide as "events" [18]. He's essentially a Turkish lobbiest, [19]. This isn’t the first time Grandmaster added an Armenian genocide denier as a source, see diff of him adding Christopher Gunn, another denialist.
- diff 2 - Huge WP:ALLEGED violation. Grandmaster removed any mention of the government falsifying records and just attributed it to belief.
- diff 3 - Grandmaster added WP:UNDUE Azerbaijani POV that a group of Armenian prisoners of war from 2020 Karabakh War were apparently a “saboteur group”. Even the Eurasianet source he cited casts a lot of doubt on them being labeled as saboteurs. It reveals one of the “saboteurs” is actually a civilian. And it also quotes an Armenian human rights activist saying they were taken as hostages. Yet another example of Grandmaster only citing what benefits his agenda and giving it a huge undue weight. Notable to add that the European Parliament source in the article states:
- “whereas credible reports have been made that Armenian service personnel and civilians have also been taken prisoner since the cessation of hostilities on 10 November 2020; whereas the Azerbaijani authorities claim that these hostages and prisoners are terrorists and do not deserve POW status under the Geneva Convention;”
- “whereas Azerbaijani forces detained these civilians even though there was no evidence that they posed any security threat that could justify their detention under international humanitarian law;”
I'm not an admin, I don't know what appropriate measures are against users in such cases. As someone involved in the ANI discussion, I wanted to share the problematic edits of Grandmaster I've noticed recently. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 02:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Result concerning Grandmaster
- This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.
- Having only reviewed the main diffs presented by Armatura and immediate context, it's hard to see the repeated invocation of epress.am as representative of Armenian media as anything other than disruptive; the assertion by Armatura that these are ultra-nationalist ravings with no significant editorial oversight or cachet appears correct. I'm less inclined to see the other two diffs as sanctionable, and am unimpressed by their inclusion in this report. I haven't yet read through Grandmaster's response and boomerang case at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 00:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)