Template:Archive box collapsible

Please tell me how to put a lock on a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruv vij (talk • contribs) 14:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What page do you want locked? This would only happen if there was a significant ongoing content dispute on the page in question resulting in an ongoing edit war, which users had been unable to resolve on the talk page. If that applied, you would file a request at requests for page protection here. If that doesn't apply then you have no chance, as pages are only locked in very limited circumstances and for short time periods. Valenciano (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhruv vij (talk • contribs) 14:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ya que usted dice dominar el español perfectamente, me dirigiré a usted usándolo, ya que es mi idioma. Me parece una absoluta vergüenza su actitud en esta discusión, indagando y buscando con lupa noticias ¡¡¡de 2004!!! como esa del ABC. La gente como yo que habitamos en la Costa del Sol sabemos que de existir algún tipo de criminalidad organizada en la Costa del Sol, es algo absolutamente minoritario, y los niveles de criminalidad son bajísimos. Ninguna de esas referencias en ningún caso, avalan la aparición de esos datos en un párrafo de historia de la Costa del Sol, que apenas ocupa 10 renglones.

Dado su apodo, Valenciano, no me extrañaría que detrás de todo ese supuesto interés por incluir toda esa rocambolesca información, solo exista un interés de atacar a la imagen turística de la Costa del Sol. Su insistencia por incluir esa trivial y absolutamente irrelevante información en una sección tan pequeña, no me deja cabida a ninguna otra clase de explicación. Ya que en ningún caso le veo interesado en incluir otro tipo de datos para mejorar el artículo con informaciones relevantes de la Costa del Sol.

Le advierto que tras este último aporte suyo a la discusión voy a ser absolutamente intransigente, y nadie excepto un bibliotecario podrá modificar el artículo en adelante. Cualquier mínima introducción de información va a tener que ser escrupulosamente discutida y consensuada, o le llevaré al tablón por romper las reglas de discusión y solicitaré la protección total del artículo. --LTblb (talk) 10:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo no tengo ningun problema con usted comunicarse conmigo en espanyol, sin embargo, creo que seria mejor comunicarse en Ingles y en la pagina del artículo en cuestion. Esto tiene la ventaja de centralizar la discusion y permitir que las personas que no hablan espanyol para contribuir a la discusion. Valenciano (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LLeva razón, y le pido disculpas por mi brusquedad, probablemente mi actitud haya sido ciertamente injusta con usted. Un saludo.--LTblb (talk) 21:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo tambien pido disculpas si se he ofendido. No es mi intencion molestarle. Si cooperamos en esto, podemos producir un mejor articulo. La costa merece mejor que las 15 lineas dedicadas a el.Valenciano (talk) 22:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aunque mi inglés es, desgraciadamente, bastante pobre, intentaré ayudarle en cualquier cosa que me solicite. Un saludo. --LTblb (talk) 23:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice you've been removing a lot of categories for dead people citing WP:BLPCAT as the justification. The relevant guideline for deceased people is WP:CAT/R, which is actually slightly different; I suspect most of the people you're removing the category from would be able to pass that criterion. Either way, probably better to cite the proper guideline to make it easier for people to follow. Frickeg (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, that does make things a little different, in the ones I've looked at I was usually considering whether their religion was sourced and whether it was relevant to their notability. Where there was any doubt, I left the category in. If it's a simple case of a reference that x belongs to a particular religion being sufficient, that's not something I'd agree with, but if it's consensus, also not something I'm going to edit against. I think I'll ask on the talk page for clarification. Valenciano (talk) 14:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of the same issue, but slightly different. You removed a category with this edit from the biography of a living person with a summary that there was nothing in the article to suggest his Catholicism contributed to his notability. But the composer in question is perhaps best known (beyond his unrelated legal career) for composing Masses and in particular, a Papal Mass for World Youth Day. Seems like a contributing factor to me. Your thoughts? Stalwart111 22:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I've restored the cat to that. Valenciano (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen your recent amendment to the stats displayed in the infobox at Roberto Soldado, and wanted to let you know these account for league stats only; other competitions are excluded. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, though we should probably add a hidden comment in the infobox to that effect. Valenciano (talk) 07:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Party of Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Valenciano, I am writing to request your assistance with the wiki article Evan Strong. There are two alerts at the top of the page that I am requesting your help with. First, I have removed all sources that could be considered "self published" and would like your review to see if the alert can be removed. Second, I understand the conflict of interest policy, but have attempted to be as objective as possible in editing the article on Evan Strong. What can we do here regarding the alert about this issue? Can we invite other wiki editors to review the article for accuracy? Is that something you can help with to be able to be able to release the alert? Thanks, rogerestrong Rogerestrong (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese invasion of Thailand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it -- I don't know what I was thinking at the moment. --Jmk (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, easy and common mistake a lot of people make. Valenciano (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend :) I do not wish to be in a edit war in Largest cities in Europe but two editors keep changing the article after we discussed on the talk page, they are removing cities who has been on the list for a long time. Lactasamir (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that, but I feel they have made a reasonable argument there. I've commented on the talk page and suggest we all discuss it there. Either way, I count four reverts of yours in a 24 hour period and don't want you to be blocked, so please discuss rather than reverting the content. Valenciano (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Valenciano :) I now feel that the needed sources on Talk:Largest cities in Europe are found, as you requested, to validate that many international institutions regards the three Caucasus states as being a part of Europe, and I hope that maybe you will look at them, and maybe restore the list as you may find suitable. So we can avoid further controversies. thank you my friend :) Lactasamir (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your comment, please read and review. Not sure how to "talk" effectively through this platform.

Thanks

Quadtripplea (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Valenciano! Thank you for your comment. I have re-done the changes to the Dexter episodes page, this time with edit comment! Cheers, Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.73.11 (talk) 23:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you just forget about this? The information in the article you try to remove is confirmed by federal Russian TV channels and newspapers. Please stop being so pestiferous. You're not right anyways.--95.72.99.126 (talk) 12:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#COI_on_All_Tomorrow.27s_Parties_.28band.29. In the meantime make your case there and please don't remove maintenance templates. Valenciano (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
	I hope you accept! - Wesley Mᴥuse 20:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)