Cannabis Indica

Content deleted Content added
GregKaye (talk | contribs)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
GregKaye (talk | contribs)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 11: Line 11:


:If I was incorrect in stating that sentence was authored by you, then I'm sorry for my mistake. I quoted the sentence directly and you can see exactly what the sentence is and I explained as best as I could why that sentence does not summarize the underlying sources accurately. [[User:There-being|There-being]] ([[User talk:There-being#top|talk]]) 13:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
:If I was incorrect in stating that sentence was authored by you, then I'm sorry for my mistake. I quoted the sentence directly and you can see exactly what the sentence is and I explained as best as I could why that sentence does not summarize the underlying sources accurately. [[User:There-being|There-being]] ([[User talk:There-being#top|talk]]) 13:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
::That's cool. [[User:GregKaye|Greg]][[User talk:GregKaye|Kaye]] 16:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
::That's super cool.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Depp_v._Heard&type=revision&diff=1093289769&oldid=1093253833&diffmode=source] [[User:GregKaye|Greg]][[User talk:GregKaye|Kaye]] 17:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:41, 15 June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to Depp v. Heard. Now that you have registered an account, please be careful to only edit when logged in moving forward. Best regards, and happy editing!TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I accidentally logged myself out while clearing cache and left a few comments on the IP. really sorry about this. There-being (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the diff?

Hi friend, I appreciate your effort and concern. I found this clearly labelled diff. Is this what you referenced? GregKaye 13:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I was incorrect in stating that sentence was authored by you, then I'm sorry for my mistake. I quoted the sentence directly and you can see exactly what the sentence is and I explained as best as I could why that sentence does not summarize the underlying sources accurately. There-being (talk) 13:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's super cool.[1] GregKaye 17:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply