Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sro23,

May you please share you issues here on this talk page before reverting any changes on the List of iOS devices article. Thank you! 😊 149.167.60.107 (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. As long as you continue to evade your block, I will continue to revert your changes, as per WP:BANREVERT. Sro23 (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Sro23 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! ~SS49~ {talk} 08:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you salt all these categorys, they have been created like 5 times today+yesterday..

• Category:Moowoo6
• Category:Moowoo7
• Category:Moowoo8
• Category:Moowoo9
• Category:Moowoo10
• Category:Moowoo11
• Category:Moowoo12
• Category:Moowoo13
• Category:Moowoo14

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 18:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've salted the ones that have been recreated over and over. The titleblacklist should hopefully take care of the rest. Sro23 (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please block user:Sexybaileycries ASAP. She clearly will not stop until blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good times. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: Speaking of partial blocks, the other day was my first time using the feature, and I really had no idea what I'm doing. There's this LTA who keeps pestering stewards' talk pages, and they've been using Special:Contributions/2405:204:3000:0:0:0:0:0/36, which is a range you partially blocked, and I'm afraid I screwed your block up. Could you please review for me? Sro23 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, PBLOCK can only handle 10 entries, it looks like you just overwrote the entries I made. However, I think that's OK for now, the LTA that targeted has been somewhat quiet lately. That's a huge range covering a lot of IP editors in India; I'd estimate less than half of the edits are constructive, but still, I'd be reluctant to kill the whole range with a full block. (P.S. For the 793 LTA, I use overlapping ranges sometimes to cover more than 10 entries. It's an imperfect workaround, but it helps). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I blocked the range fully for a little bit, realized it was too wide and started to panic, and that's when things went downhill. It didn't seem fair preventing them from editing the entire User talk namespace either. Sorry about that and thanks for the response. Sro23 (talk) 15:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

revdel or talk page protection? [1] Meters (talk) 05:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can keep an eye on it. Sro23 (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I blanked it and just wanted you to be aware. Meters (talk) 05:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 - SchroCat (talk) 15:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not see the irony in making a "toxic" comment like this about a group of people whom you accuse of being "toxic"? The sheer bloody arrogance on display here is astonishing. Here's a tip: If you don't want people to be "toxic", about anything, then don't be "toxic" yourself. Cassianto^Talk 19:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]