This page will always be INTENTIONALLY left blank.

What is your problem? I reached out to you because you said that you were being abused by administrators (or an administrator), and you seemed to need help. Please stop deleting your wikilinked signature, which you put there in the first place, from the post that you left on my talk page. Further, the Wikipedia:SIG behavioral guideline, which you cited when you delinked your signature a second time, says the opposite of what you claim:

Internal links

Signatures must include at least one internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log. The lack of such a link is widely viewed as obstructive.

Further, what do you think that you are accomplishing by delinking your signature? I know how to find your talk page if I want, and so does anyone else. Annoying other is not the way to help build this encyclopedia. Please comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you. —Finell 18:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look I do not know who you are or wish to know who you are. I didn't say I was being abused, I said I was advocating for someone who is. I want to be left alone and prefer not to have idle chat with people on Wikipedia. If I need help I will ask, but people are jumping in where it is not needed. I don't need the welcome wagon, and I don't need to have friends on Wikipedia.

Where in Wikipedia that states that if I choose to be left alone that it is against policy?

I read through the document clearly as possible about signature and it did state that I can use the 5 tildes as my signature. I interpret the document of link signature as to those who customize their signature. People accuse me of being disruptive, but other sees me as being direct. And of the same people who accuse me of being disruptive are also at the same time acting all to super authoritive above the policy.

So please, leave me alone, will ya? I'll understand things in my own way since people push and shove their "priviliges" up against those who want to take the time to understand things they may have done wrong.

Is this possible at all? I don't want to be your friend.

Wikipedia is a collaborative project to build an encyclopedia. The collaborative part of that is that an open community is who is building the encyclopedia. We have to have community standards in order to function as that community. One of those is knowing who we are dealing with.

It is evident that this wasn't entirely clear to you earlier - however, it should be now.

If you don't want to participate in the community, you should reconsider participating in Wikipedia. Feedback and discussions are as important as raw edits to articles - we assume that nobody is perfect, and that a dynamic discussion is more likely to lead to long term improvement than any one contributor.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm not going away. I'm still going to improve Wikipedia. As such I am going to explore avenues to express this grievence to the highest possible. Yeah, I'll go the learning process of figuring out the complex rules and guidelines of Wikipedia and the many different opinions of others who arbitrate with abusiveness of their "powers". I don't want to be anyone friend so as such idle chat in this manner is not appreciated!