Hi Mama meta modal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, this, this, this and this edit, "Improve" is a subjective opinion of yours - to avoid any semblance of canvassing, you'd want o keep the language as neutral as possible. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and sorry for this. I will try to make them more neutral. Let me know if it is still not all right. Mama meta modal (talk) 08:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Yeah the policies here can be a bit of a maze sometimes.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. Thanks for your help. I just "corrected" the pages you mentioned above. Mama meta modal (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks to Cas for pointing it out (I was going to) and to Mama for fixing. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what happened there, I can see from your diff between Cas Liber's edit and mine that your statement is correct, but all I intended to do was add my statement objecting to the massive expansion of the move request. I never intentionally remove or modify other people's comments, apart from maybe indenting for clarity or to revert vandalism. I can't explain how I managed to delete the other text in the process, but apologies for inadvertently doing so. Do you want me to fix the damage or would you rather do so yourself? Cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I already restored the original version. Mama meta modal (talk) 13:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Move review/Log/2014 March#Restringing. Andrewa (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have guessed, this help to make the order slightly more clear. Mama meta modal (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Please don't do it. I have serious objections to several of these restringings, as I have said elsewhere, but here are some examples just to make sure you know that I do have some grounds for objection.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2014_March&diff=prev&oldid=601963485 restrung one of my comments so that it appeared to be a reply to Cas Liber not to JHunterJ, which was illogical and misrepresented what I said. It also restrung other comments, which I believe was also inappropriate, but that's the one that was clearly wrong.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Move_review/Log/2014_March&diff=prev&oldid=602785334 did several things. The one to which I object is the one I reversed at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Move_review/Log/2014_March&diff=602786882&oldid=602785334 which effectively removed my signature from most of the post.

I repeat, please stop restringing my posts. You do not seem to grasp some of the principles involved in the correct formatting of these discussions, and in any case you have no right to do it. So, just stop. Please.

If you think I have made a mistake in the indenting, please discuss it on my talk page, and I'll fix any problems you find. Thank you. Andrewa (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]