Hello, JorgeLaArdilla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 14:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emett, (Frederick) Rowland. Since you had some involvement with the Emett, (Frederick) Rowland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm User:Girth Summit. I noticed that you had made a number of changes to the Hydrotherapy page recently, so I thought I'd reach out to you to see whether you might be in a position to help me. I'm concerned with the description of modern hydrotherapy - most of the sources used are not WP:MEDRS-compliant, and I'm not convinced that the article adequately describes what hydrotherapy practice looks like nowadays. Are you knowledgeable in this area, and would you be interested in collaborating to improve the article? Girth Summit (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect China dossier. Since you had some involvement with the China dossier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DrKay (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you have a reason for changing the capitalization of sura name articles e.g. Al-Ahqaf → Al aḥqāf and a lot of others, but the previous naming is a longstanding practice and I'd suggest not changing it without some discussions to see if other editors agree with your reasoning. For a start, you can begin a discussion in WT:ISLAM. HaEr48 (talk) 00:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move any more such articles without discussion. You moved Surah to Sūrah referring to WP:MOSAR, but WP:MOSAR#Common transcription means that we should use "Surah".

Please revert any other surah pages that you have moved to versions with diacritics, where that version is not in accordance with WP:MOSAR. – Fayenatic London 22:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayenatic london:, would you mind checking if that applies as well to recent non-title transcription changes of a similar nature to Dhul-Qarnayn such as here, here, here, or here? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSAR#Common transcription may not specifically cover those, but it certainly covers Special:diff/899030559, moving Al-Ahzab to Al aḥzāb.

JorgeLaArdilla, you are now blocked for 24 hours. Please consider your future conduct carefully. Do not move pages again from longstanding names without discussion. If you wish to gain the confidence of other editors, you should also start to respond to discussions and requests on this page and other relevant talk pages. – Fayenatic London 18:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Fayenatic London 18:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Hadith. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 12:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned about this just last month. General Ization ^Talk 12:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Al-Zamakhshari, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 12:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Salwa El-Awa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www-fri.swansea.ac.uk/staff/arts-and-humanities/academic/salwamsel-awa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 16:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing unsourced material to the lead at Dhul-Qarnayn, as you did here and here. Your changes have been undone. Please see WP:CITE and Help:Footnotes for how to create footnotes to reliable sources. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It also looks like you've been making other changes to Dhul-Qarnayn contrary to WP:MOSAR that you've already been warned about previously a couple of times at least. Please stop. Mathglot (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I moved page Al kahf back to Al-Kahf again, undoing your recent unilateral move. Please seek consensus for page moves of this nature on the article's Talk page first. Please see Wikipedia:Moving a page, and especially section #Before moving a page. Normally, when you want to move a page, you should follow the procedures given at WP:RM#CM. See sections #Changing capitalization of sura article, and #April 2019 above. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: user’s page move happened before the block above and does not represent recidivism. Mathglot (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have moved An-Nas again, and Al-Ahzab. At least you gave a rationale on the talk page for the first one. That is now open for discussion. Please await consensus on that page before moving any others. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Somatometry. Since you had some involvement with the Somatometry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2004–05 season in association football. Since you had some involvement with the 2004–05 season in association football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 14 Ibrāhım̄. Since you had some involvement with the 14 Ibrāhım̄ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Wugapodes [t^hɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 03:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern Languages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Medr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Additionally, the article claims to be about a regional god, yet the content of the article talks about a king and Christianity without first contributing much if anything related to the deity. As such, the article lacks a focus. Please revise, restructure, and expand this prior to bringing this back into a published article. Happy to review it again if that will help. FULBERT (talk) 01:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Issam Abuanza.

User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

It's not clear to me that Abuanza's quote vis-a-vis Al-Kasasbeh is WP:DUE.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding William Loftus into the notable members list of Natural History Society of Northumbria. The citation you gave is hidden by a paywall. Can you confirm that the reference does show that Loftus was a member, and preferably include the relevant quote in the citation against your entry in the list, please? CitizenEd (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sam Tarry; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on "cognitive" revolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JorgeLaArdilla, you have recently edited the article TERF. Below is a standard notice from ArbCom directed to all editors editing this, or any article related to gender. Please read it and understand it; thanks.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Mathglot (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z33

What are you playing at? Restore his full name. Barton Dave (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vatican summit. Since you had some involvement with the Vatican summit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Abu Muhammad". Since you had some involvement with the "Abu Muhammad" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 12:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chapter named after Mary. Since you had some involvement with the Chapter named after Mary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Medr, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect His Prophet. Since you had some involvement with the His Prophet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Medr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hangover 2 Now in Thailand! (2011). Since you had some involvement with the Hangover 2 Now in Thailand! (2011) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not independently notable. Feel free to contribute to the already mentioned article below

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the United Kingdom. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the United Kingdom]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

This draft does not have enough information for a separate article, but should be included in the parent article on 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the United Kingdom. Discussion can be on the talk page of that article. Discussion of the merits of a separate article on this topic can be on this draft talk page, but two paragraphs does not warrant a separate article when there is a longer article to include the information in.

Do not resubmit this draft again without discussion (but discussion is not likely to result in a separate article being approved).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Event of Ghadir Khumm. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Avian phenomena and incidents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete Wikipedia is not a random collection of things; there are no sources to indicate this is a complete or notable collections of items requiring disambiguation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aš-šūsi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheseusHeLl (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on الشُّوسِ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheseusHeLl (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Birmingham Quran manuscript into Maryam (surah). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ṣād (surah), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –User456541 13:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ṣād (surah). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –User456541 13:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad's first revelation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic tradition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avian phenomena and incidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avian phenomena and incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. happy days, Lindsay^Hello 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of the Quran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brill

Ibn Abbas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brill

Ibn Taymiyyah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hisba

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Traditional scholars. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 17#Traditional scholars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The World's Oldest Library. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#The World's Oldest Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 21st-century Quran. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 22#21st-century Quran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ʿĀd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic tradition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, regarding your addition of George Sale material, I think to avoid the WP:UNDUE problem it's better to not indiscriminately add his opinion/analysis to every Quran article. When appropriate, e.g. if it covered significantly by more recent scolarship, we can add it for example to George Sale's own article, but IMO we should avoid it adding George Sale as a reference on its own right, because according to WP:RS AGE works such as his should not be treated as RS. HaEr48 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HaEr48: In a nutshell: It is a significant viewpoint in needed of being fairly represented within the exegisis. His work is basesd on Arabic Quranic texts that are extant and in reputable archives.

OK I have read the policy. WP:Undue: Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.

I get that I may seem to be plastering the surahs with George Sale material, but I feel I have not been indiscriminately add his opinion/analysis to every Quran article. George Sale was a protestant using the Vatican Quran in a time when Islam might be classified a political superpower, before inferiority complexes, before the time of the "arrogant" orientalist, the Fall of the Caliphate, the "new" traditional Islam or the Revisionist School of Islamic Studies. The problem is that the other perspectives have so far not been able to add much quality content themselves. My LT plan would be to do this too if no one else comes along.

The premise of the content guideline, WP:Age matters concerns scientific and academic fields, where older sources may be inaccurate. In Religious studies older sources are often more accurate, provide a vivid context, and provenace to what might otherwise seem a recent idea.

JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that older sources might in certain cases provide more vivid context, as you put it, but IMO they shouldn't be taken as source of their own. We should include it only if it is influential or covered significantly by more recent scholarship that meets WP:RS. Otherwise it will be a free-for-all, everyone will find their favourite historical author and put that as the voice of the Wikipedia article on the topic. HaEr48 (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]