^{Hi, I did not misspell my own name, there's just not a P anywhere in there!}

Wikipedia does not care about you or me being qualified scholars. Wikipedia is not a scholarly site, but a summary of sources that speak for themselves. We all have the right to edit, but there are rules to make sure that proper sources are used for appropriate articles and editors are civil. -- In other words: duh only book-lurnin we likes 's frum books, not school-folk wit deir fancy-shmancy deeplomas. Ye ain't gots to be unschooled to edit, but ya bettah bring yer damn sauces like uh chef at tha Italian resteeraunt.

New stuff goes at the bottom, people. Also, please sign your posts in talk pages with four tildes (~~~~).

Glad to see you back - at least I hope you're back. Dougweller (talk) 06:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, glad to hear from you. Unfortunately, I'm still going to be semi-retired for a while. As long as my job deals with balancing opposition from management and customers, I really don't need to get into any arguments about policy or content (at least ones that I haven't completely memorized). I will come on to add anything that I come across in my reading, and I'll try to check here every now and then if there's something, though. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shame, but I sympathise. Dougweller (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck off my Pagan you bareback mancunt pig slut.— Preceding unsigned comment added by LimosaCorel (talk • contribs)

Wow, such enlightened behavior. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to read WP:Civility.--Charles (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already templated them. BTW, could you keep an eye on Pagan religions for me? I'm at 3r, and the above individual keeps adding unsourced (and sometimes flat out mistaken) info. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone got told next time it's a block. Dougweller (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Limosa seems to be trying to work in good faith, but has some issues with cooperation and citing sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still am not at a point where I need to be as involved as I used to be, but it's not gonna kill me to work on stuff where I don't get into too many vitriolic arguments and disputes, and I'm probably going to be spending a lot of time trying to perfect some new articles or overhauls thereof, as I did for the Lesser Key of Solomon. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was copyvio, I've warned the editor. Thanks for reverting. Dougweller (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia entry for me was created by my academic department. I have to go over it and see if I can edit it. Theo Pavlidis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.78.56 (talk) 02:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment over on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard with the WP:OUTING note. And sorry that I left your comment dangling after I deleted User:ChiefClancyWiggam's edit for privacy concerns. There's been a bit of a cluster of sockpuppets on this issue and I'm playing catch-up. I'm not always being neat. I doubt you're interested but there's Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Msc008 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastic shaman. Oh, I see you've already been there. Cheers, Pigman☿/talk 03:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no need to apologize. Happy hunting. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But I do need to apologize. I must maintain my self-image as a polite and civilized WP editor. This offsets my horribly rude sociopathic personality in real life. Thank you for your gracious and encouraging comment. Cheers, Pigman☿/talk 04:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a place with documentation about my work http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=N7m4vIQAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theopav (talk • contribs) 18:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the page. It was created by my academic department expecting me to edit it, etc. They created an account for me for that purpose. Unfortunately, I do not have the time or patience to familiarize myself with the Wikipedia system. I do not need the hassle. 19:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)19:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theopav (talk • contribs)

"protect this site and its honest, non-promotional, non-edit-warring users" - might be best to remove the word "honest" from that, IMHO, because it implies the people editing the article are not honest.

No big deal, just a thought. 88.104.19.233 (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that "non-promotional" after it that it'd be a little more clear I meant everyone but Indiggo77, who's now blocked at any rate. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Banned user Indiggo77 is back as User talk:Lizzie112079. What can be done about that? Thanks. 63.247.160.139 (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop reverting when I am trying to edit the page. The page needs neutral points of view. I am always explaining my edits. Indiggo are actresses, singers, writers according to Imagem and other sites. They are not reality stars. Why do you keep deleting? Why don't you post manager David Sonenberg who states that Indiggo are "the real deal" in several articles? Piers Morgan comment was racist. DavidLeib (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]