Cannabis Indica

Content deleted Content added
→‎WP:CITEVAR: new section
Alarbus (talk | contribs)
Line 65: Line 65:


I hope you are aware of the above guideline. You have converted [[Frederick Russell Burnham]] into a mess of list-defined references which cover 70 % of the edit window. Please revert yourself. --[[User:Eisfbnore|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">'''Eisfbnore'''</font>]]&nbsp;<sup><small>[[User talk:Eisfbnore|<font color="#009900">''talk''</font>]]</small></sup> 10:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I hope you are aware of the above guideline. You have converted [[Frederick Russell Burnham]] into a mess of list-defined references which cover 70 % of the edit window. Please revert yourself. --[[User:Eisfbnore|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">'''Eisfbnore'''</font>]]&nbsp;<sup><small>[[User talk:Eisfbnore|<font color="#009900">''talk''</font>]]</small></sup> 10:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
: And the primary authors are fine with it. [[User:Alarbus|Alarbus]] ([[User talk:Alarbus#top|talk]]) 10:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:53, 28 February 2012

The CCI is over, 719 of 729 articles found with no problems. Recommended reading: Great Dismal Swamp maroons, I added a quote: "These groups are very inspirational. As details unfold, we are increasingly able to show how people have the ability, as individuals and communities, to take control of their lives, even under oppressive conditions." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Now I've tried them out, they are okay, but the date field still bugs me as it is awkwardly placed, is there any way to redraw/reformat the template to make the date appear after the publisher? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I find the date well placed and it is done this way on some millions of pages. Having the date after the author makes sense to me. Alarbus (talk) 04:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you are aware of the above guideline. You have converted Frederick Russell Burnham into a mess of list-defined references which cover 70 % of the edit window. Please revert yourself. --Eisfbnore talk 10:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And the primary authors are fine with it. Alarbus (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply