→Sinovac Ph II results: new section |
→Discretionary sanctions notification: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
On my talk page, you said: ''could you provide an fuller rationale as to why you deleted my edit re "not independent journal report; the company controlled what it released to Reuters; needs to be a journal publication". Is it because the news was reported in Reuters (a non-scientific journal), or is it because you didn't believe the company actually released the pre-print Phase II results? Either way, i have attached the [https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.31.20161216v1 pre-print] from medRxiv. Is this what you were looking for?'' |
On my talk page, you said: ''could you provide an fuller rationale as to why you deleted my edit re "not independent journal report; the company controlled what it released to Reuters; needs to be a journal publication". Is it because the news was reported in Reuters (a non-scientific journal), or is it because you didn't believe the company actually released the pre-print Phase II results? Either way, i have attached the [https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.31.20161216v1 pre-print] from medRxiv. Is this what you were looking for?'' |
||
:Note that the medRxiv source the study has not yet been peer-reviewed. Neither Reuters nor this source would qualify as "final" results for the Phase II trial. Let's wait for the full peer-reviewed publication. Thanks. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 00:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
:Note that the medRxiv source the study has not yet been peer-reviewed. Neither Reuters nor this source would qualify as "final" results for the Phase II trial. Let's wait for the full peer-reviewed publication. Thanks. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 00:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Discretionary sanctions notification == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:17, 29 August 2020
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Albertaont, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Sinovac Ph II results
On my talk page, you said: could you provide an fuller rationale as to why you deleted my edit re "not independent journal report; the company controlled what it released to Reuters; needs to be a journal publication". Is it because the news was reported in Reuters (a non-scientific journal), or is it because you didn't believe the company actually released the pre-print Phase II results? Either way, i have attached the pre-print from medRxiv. Is this what you were looking for?
- Note that the medRxiv source the study has not yet been peer-reviewed. Neither Reuters nor this source would qualify as "final" results for the Phase II trial. Let's wait for the full peer-reviewed publication. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 FDW777 (talk) 10:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)