The Truth According to Wikipedia was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 2, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 24, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Film Quarterly called the documentary The Truth According to Wikipedia "a sharp and wide-ranging overview of wiki-pistemology"?

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Film: Documentary B‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Documentary films task force. Internet culture B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Wikipedia B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Netherlands B‑class This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article had a prior GA Review which was not successful. The prior review is at Talk:The Truth According to Wikipedia/GA1.

Note: I've since attempted to address all suggestions raised from that review. — Cirt (talk) 00:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prefer to have less talk page clutter, please.

I checked Wikipedia:Talk page layout (WP:TPL) and I didn't see anything about that.

Rather keep talk page as clutter-free as possible, while still having the WikiProjects there.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjectBanners is a collapsed WikiProjectBannerShell and WP:TPL explicitly says: "Any WikiProject banners (in a {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template when 2+ are present, or in {{WikiProjectBanners}} when 6+ are present)". – Editør (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I changed it to {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} -- but let's keep it collapsed, please, to avoid clutter. WP:TPL says nothing about collapsed or not. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would rather not have non-notable person as redlink.

Redlink existed for quite some time without a Wikipedia article about that person.

If someone creates a Wikipedia article about that person, and that article satisfies and ably demonstrates notability standards for this site, then we could add it back then.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did some due diligence, and took a look at potential sources at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL -- and there's a smattering of some brief mentions, but not much in the way of in-depth coverage from secondary sources. Not sure that subject could have its own Wikipedia article at this point in time, per WP:NOTE. — Cirt (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ndesanjo Macha was the only person in the starring list that didn't have a wikilink, that why I added the link. I think that if he is notable he should have a link even when it is red, and if he is not notable he should not be in the list. – Editør (talk) 19:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]