This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. India C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. London C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Women in Music Unassessed This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In the section for death...Depressed has been replaced by surprised. 76.29.41.179 (talk) 05:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Racklever (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RIP Jiah khan..! ThinkingYouth (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what was she doing after 2010 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.252.247 (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When we put aside copyright issues, is it ethical for an encyclopedic project to publish a transcript of Jiah Khan's suicide note?? She addresses a (presumably) living person in it, and I don't think it is particularly sensitive and considerate - both to her and to the person she addresses. I'll post this also at WP:BLPN. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded there--grossly inappropriate content in several respects, and I am so sure about this, that I have removed it. This is an admin action under BLP enforcement. DGG ( talk ) 22:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey what's so wrong about putting her suicide note in the wikipedia page? I strongly feel it must be included. Every single news website has published it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudarshansudarshan (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are not a tabloid newspaper, but an encyclopedia. I've removed it again. The note is available via external link. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 05:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the film and Manisha Koirala's role is played by Priya Parulekar who also played Young Manisha in Khamoshi. Shakirfan (talk)

 Done--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Removed it again. Please do not add that back before such consensus forms at Talk:Dil_Se..#Young_Meghna. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jiah Khan was indeed in "Dil se" movie. Please find supporting links below:

https://www.herzindagi.com/society-culture/jiah-khan-death-anniversary-eight-lesser-known-facts-about-late-actress-article-108881

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/photo-features/jiah-khan-lesser-known-facts/photostory/51057276.cms

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/movies/story/20130617-jiah-khan-bollywood-nafisa-sooraj-aditya-pancholi-763994-1999-11-30

If NO-ONE has objection, this shall be added. Abbasquadir (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbasquadir: You are responding to a conversation from 7 years ago, so I don't think anyone will care. Please include a reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have already included 3 references! Abbasquadir (talk) 16:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbasquadir: Clearly I meant when you add it to the article. By the way, this edit contained a reference that did not resolve. It has an access-date of 2013. Please check references rather than just copy/pasting them into articles assuming they say what you think they say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

where have I copy-pasted into article? It's into the Talkpage dear! Please check before assuming! Abbasquadir (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbasquadir: Please pay attention. I provided a link above, but here it is again: In this edit of yours, you added a reference into the article. The reference didn't resolve. If you had actually checked it, you would know that. And since it has an access date of October 2013, that suggests that you copied it from somewhere instead of formatting it from scratch. Got it? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jiah Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110510111950/http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/02/17/2268/index.html to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/02/17/2268/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606010907/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Failing-career-troubled-love-life-killed-25-year-old-Jiah-Khan/Article1-1071076.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Failing-career-troubled-love-life-killed-25-year-old-Jiah-Khan/Article1-1071076.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131010131717/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ghajini/Article1-360983.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Reviews/Review-Ghajini/Article1-360983.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jiah Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091106020341/http://www.starboxoffice.com/newsdetails.aspx?xfile=2009%2FSeptember%2FNews_20090909_47 to http://www.starboxoffice.com/newsdetails.aspx?xfile=2009%2FSeptember%2FNews_20090909_47

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My request on the Jiah Khans wikipedia page is that , sources allwge that it was staged as suicide, but it wasnt a suicide. So , the cause of death being proclaimed as suicide can be confusing. The mother of Jiah Khan is still fighting thw case, and insists that it has been a murder that is staged as a suicide. Immediately listing thw cause the cause of death as suicide might be wrong, and i prefer that it might be changed to proclaimed as suicide but some sources say murder..something like that. Vyshu1997 (talk) 08:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 09:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change cause of death from "Suicide" to "Unsolved mystery- Evidences are there regarding murder, but the murderer is protected by Mumbai Police" 2405:205:128B:D80C:F8F7:3B0B:7FB9:6D17 (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Seagull123 Φ 12:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SOURCE: Jiah's hand written suicide note

(Redacted)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbasquadir (talk • contribs) 18:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've redacted the note because it is potentially a copyright violation. I've also removed the content from the article because if India Today published the entire note, the only mention of rape or torture is "After all the pain, the rape, the abuse, the torture I have seen previously I didn't deserve this." That's highly ambiguous phrasing that could be an accusation that Pancholi committed these acts, or it could also be interpreted in other ways, including that Khan experienced these things "previously" or prior to her relationship with Pancholi. I don't know how anyone can say definitively that she was accusing Pancholi of rape and physical torture. Also, "torture" is vague. People often use the word as hyperbole, or to describe emotional turmoil. So again, it's not clear that she was describing physical torture, especially at the hands of Pancholi. And since it's potentially defamatory content, we have to be very careful about how we present this information. I'd only be comfortable including it if the wider Wikipedia community could come up with a way to present some form of that content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]