Cannabis Indica

Featured articleGanymede (moon) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starGanymede (moon) is part of the Jupiter series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 13, 2010.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 27, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
March 10, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
September 4, 2008Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
September 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
July 17, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
July 17, 2009Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 7, 2011, January 7, 2014, January 7, 2015, January 7, 2016, January 7, 2017, January 7, 2018, and January 7, 2020.
Current status: Featured article

Looking at this article for WP:URFA/2020 and also for a potential TFA on 2020-12-21:

  • The article had three different date styles (mdy, dmy and ISO): I picked what I thought the most common and ran the script. But since Jupiter and Saturn use dmy, I wonder if the dates here should be the same.
  • There are considerable duplicate links. See WP:OVERLINK, but some may be deemed necessary and retained (editor discretion). Installing this script will add an item to your toolbox that shows duplicate links in red: User:Evad37/duplinks-alt  Done
  • There are MOS:SANDWICH and image layout problems everywhere. If knowledgeable editors will delete those that are least useful (decorative), I am willing to go through and improve the layout. There are considerable images here that are not aiding our understanding of the topic; by reducing those, we can get a better layout on the ones that stay.  Done
  • External links probably could benefit from a trim, per WP:ELNO. FAs are supposed to be comprehensive, meaning there should be little in EL that can't be covered in the article. Do these add something to the article that we can't cover in a comprehensive article?
  • The article appears to be well cited, but should be reviewed for uncited or outdated text.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I may be so bold, I'll check off ones I've tried to take care of as I find the time, here and on the other talk pages mentioned at the linked discussions - Astrophobe (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting probably still needs work and the page feels a bit cramped to me, but there are no more MOS:SANDWICH issues. - Astrophobe (talk) 23:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cite error: A list-defined reference named "cwgjupgany" is not used in the content (see the help page). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply