This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Nevada C‑class (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Organizations C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For the sentence "Multiple members of the group participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, with three members pleading guilty to federal criminal offenses", it should be changed to "Multiple members of the group participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, with four members pleading guilty to federal criminal offenses" because a fourth Oath Keeper has pleaded guilty ([1]. 2603:6010:D307:98CA:F976:1365:1D8F:9CC6 (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done soibangla (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. Doug Weller talk 11:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to leaked data described in an October 8, 2021 article in Buzzfeed News, a New York City Oathkeeper wrote in March, "I am mustering a small army to work on the wikipedia article about Oath Keepers. There is an army of leftists and propaganda folk that put disinformation on wikipedia. We need to combat that." [3]

Current efforts to maintain NPOV should take this into account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.124.33.97 (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Sept 13 2021 hack by Anonymous revealed at list of 38,000 email addresses for oath keepers members. Therefore the line that says " researchers estimate its actual membership as probably no higher than 5,000" is no longer in line with evidence and should be removed. A reference to the hack should be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackGunn (talk • contribs) 23:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, I'll work on that. soibangla (talk) 00:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure you find good sourcing. A list of 38,000 emails doesn't necessarily mean 38,000 active members. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:19, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my two edits used "suggested" and "apparent." It could be their mailing list that includes prospective recruits. soibangla (talk) 17:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Several organizations that monitor U.S. domestic terrorism and hate groups describe the group as extremist or radical. Which ones? Are Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center the only ones? Jokem (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those are mentioned in the article cited. I believe that is enough. How many do you need? Myotus (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VQuakr, you don't think The organization was subpoenaed by the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack in November 2021 is leadworthy, especially in the context of the paragraph that precedes it? Really? soibangla (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on your talk page, the lead summarizes the body. So it definitely doesn't get in the lead if it isn't mentioned in the body. I've no objection to a brief mention in the lead summarizing the body. Cites should go in the body not the lead. VQuakr (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you simply include in the body and then also in the lead? If you're in a rush, include such updates in the body, ping me in summary and I'll propagate it to lead. — Alalch Emis (talk) 19:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VQuakr: Rather than unnecessarily creating drama by falsely accusing me of edit warring, perhaps the better solution is WP:SOFIXIT. Easy! soibangla (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]