Cannabis Indica

Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:
| text =A major contributor to this page was sponsored by Emeco.
| text =A major contributor to this page was sponsored by Emeco.
}}
}}

== Restoration hardware lawsuit ==

{{ping|Sapiens scriptor}} I saw that you added a section called "Restoration Hardware Lawsuit", but I wasn't sure if you noticed the lawsuit was already covered on the [[Emeco 1006]] page on the chair the lawsuit was about (second to last paragraph in the History section). Also, [[WP:CRITS]] discourages us from creating a dedicated section about a controversy. I would suggest keeping it on just one page to avoid redundancy, or choosing one page to cover it in-depth and mention it on the other. [[User:CorporateM|David King, Ethical Wiki]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 13:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:20, 4 November 2015

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 10 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconBusiness Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Restoration hardware lawsuit

@Sapiens scriptor: I saw that you added a section called "Restoration Hardware Lawsuit", but I wasn't sure if you noticed the lawsuit was already covered on the Emeco 1006 page on the chair the lawsuit was about (second to last paragraph in the History section). Also, WP:CRITS discourages us from creating a dedicated section about a controversy. I would suggest keeping it on just one page to avoid redundancy, or choosing one page to cover it in-depth and mention it on the other. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 13:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply