Content deleted Content added
permanent disclaimers should be avoided in articles; moving template to talk page |
CorporateM (talk | contribs) →Restoration hardware lawsuit: new section |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| text =A major contributor to this page was sponsored by Emeco. |
| text =A major contributor to this page was sponsored by Emeco. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Restoration hardware lawsuit == |
|||
{{ping|Sapiens scriptor}} I saw that you added a section called "Restoration Hardware Lawsuit", but I wasn't sure if you noticed the lawsuit was already covered on the [[Emeco 1006]] page on the chair the lawsuit was about (second to last paragraph in the History section). Also, [[WP:CRITS]] discourages us from creating a dedicated section about a controversy. I would suggest keeping it on just one page to avoid redundancy, or choosing one page to cover it in-depth and mention it on the other. [[User:CorporateM|David King, Ethical Wiki]] ([[User_talk:CorporateM|Talk]]) 13:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:20, 4 November 2015
Articles for creation Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Business Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Restoration hardware lawsuit
@Sapiens scriptor: I saw that you added a section called "Restoration Hardware Lawsuit", but I wasn't sure if you noticed the lawsuit was already covered on the Emeco 1006 page on the chair the lawsuit was about (second to last paragraph in the History section). Also, WP:CRITS discourages us from creating a dedicated section about a controversy. I would suggest keeping it on just one page to avoid redundancy, or choosing one page to cover it in-depth and mention it on the other. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 13:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)