Cannabis Indica

Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2021-06-18. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger
Line 53: Line 53:


This article contains 6 paragraphs in the lead section. According to [[WP:LEAD]], an article should have no more than 4 well-written paragraphs (especially because this is a featured article). Could someone knowledgable about Wallace combine/remove some paragraphs? Cheers. [[User:Wretchskull|Wretchskull]] ([[User talk:Wretchskull|talk]]) 13:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
This article contains 6 paragraphs in the lead section. According to [[WP:LEAD]], an article should have no more than 4 well-written paragraphs (especially because this is a featured article). Could someone knowledgable about Wallace combine/remove some paragraphs? Cheers. [[User:Wretchskull|Wretchskull]] ([[User talk:Wretchskull|talk]]) 13:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

== [[WP:URFA/2020]] sweep ==

This older FA has a good bit of uncited text, including a couple entire short paragraphs in various sections. Per the [[WP:FACR|current FA critiera]], the vast majority of the uncited material will need cited in order to meet the current criteria. If this is not done, a [[WP:FAR|featured article review]] may be necessary. [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> [[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]</sub> 16:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:40, 3 July 2021

Template:Vital article

Featured articleAlfred Russel Wallace is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 8, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 26, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 12, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 25, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Template:Indonesian selected biography talk modern

Suggestion to change biased wording

I noticed in the "Legacy and historical perception" section of this article that a sentence within it is not neutral. It states, "He was undoubtedly one of the greatest natural history explorers of the 19th century."[1] I think the sentence could be reconstructed in a way that gets the point across that his achievements were in fact significant, yet only presents facts. Something along the lines of "Wallace had many significant achievements and made many discoveries, making him a prominent natural history explorer during his time," which still ties into the following sentence? --Jldgx6 (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive lead

This article contains 6 paragraphs in the lead section. According to WP:LEAD, an article should have no more than 4 well-written paragraphs (especially because this is a featured article). Could someone knowledgable about Wallace combine/remove some paragraphs? Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This older FA has a good bit of uncited text, including a couple entire short paragraphs in various sections. Per the current FA critiera, the vast majority of the uncited material will need cited in order to meet the current criteria. If this is not done, a featured article review may be necessary. Hog Farm Talk 16:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply