FA	A	GA	B	C	Start	Stub	FL	List	Category	Disambig	Draft	File	Portal	Project	Redirect	Template	NA	???	Total
64	0	239	1,424	5,374	30,189	26,969	8	3,276	25,887	180	93	175	26	20	2,479	3,149	22	197	99,771

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

Archives

WikiProject Ireland September 2006-August 2007 September 2007-January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 1 April 2008-17 April 2008 April 2008-September 2008 October 2008-December 2008 January 2009-April 2009 May 2009-July 2009 August 2009-October 2009 November 2009-September 2010 September 2010-March 2011 March 2011-June 2011 June 2011-Nov 2011 Nov 2011-March 2013 March 2013-June 2014 June 2014- Irish Wikipedians' notice board August 2004-September 2004 September 2004 October 2004 21st October - 7th November 2005 November 2004 - January 2005 February 2005 March 2005-April 2005 May 2005 May 2005-September 2009 September 2005-November 2005 November 2005-February 2006 February 2006-April 2006 April 2006-August 2006 August 2006-November 2006 November 2006-February 2007 February 2007-July 2007 August 2007-October 2007 Oct 07-Early/Mid Nov 07 November 2007 November 2007-February 2008 March 2008-April 2008 Northern Irish Wikipedians' notice board February 2006-July 2006 April 2006-November 2009

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Edit this box

Should be agree best practice for when government departments and ministers are renamed. Nearly every time a new government is formed, there'll be some rejigging of government departments (the rainbow coalition was the most recent that didn't do this). There's a reasonable instinct to keep Wikipedia up to date and rename the departments after the Taoiseach's announcement (indeed, I have myself prematurely moved pages, as I acknowledged here). However, I would proposed that pages are moved only after we see the government order with the new name, e.g. Children and Youth Affairs (Alteration of Name of Department and Title of Minister) Order 2020. There are three reasons for this:

• Wikipedia should be accurate at any given time. Even an obvious one, like Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade becoming Minister for Foreign Affairs (Ireland) should wait till we see the order before moving. It recognises the formal process by which these are changed; not an announcement in the Dáil or a government press release, but a government order signed by the Taoiseach. In the mean time, we can use piped links on pages like Government of the 33rd Dáil or Simon Coveney. Perhaps even they should have the accurate title in the text, but there's a good case that in listing ministers, you want to show the agreement between parties about where responsibilities will go.
• It ensures titles are accurate, e.g., that it's the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media, not the Minister for Media, Tourism, Arts, Culture, Sport and the Gaeltacht. Otherwise, we end up with the inaccurate title referenced in a few places, before being spotted.
• It prevents against errors. For example, the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport was moved on 27 July to Minister for Climate Action, Communication Networks and Transport, with the Minister for Communications, Climate Action and Environment having been marked as abolished. In fact, MTTS became the Minister for Transport (Ireland), while MCCAE became the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications (Ryan holding two titles). When I went through the links after changing these to the correct title, there ended being anomalies that weren't corrected by simple redirects, like a reference to the minister for transport in Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in July 2020 linking to the Minister for the Environment. Holding off makes particular sense when there are mergers of departments or very significant transfers. We also had Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade moved in error to Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defence.

I'm not sure it's worthwhile reversing any changes that have been made prematurely so far, but we could benefit from establishing this before the next Taoiseach moves these around again. –Iveagh Gardens (talk) 07:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - that all seems eminently sensible. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - well stated, and as Bastun says. SeoR (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, makes perfect sense. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The RIA announced this month that the Dictionary of Irish Biography would be open access from next spring. The website dib.cambridge.org seems to have already been made free; dunno if this is a temporary trial run or a soft launch. In any case, time for a Template:Cite DIrB along the lines of Template:Cite ODNB. There's already a wikidata property, although it's not in Template:Authority control, I guess biographical dictionaries are not authority catalogs. jnestorius^(talk) 02:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jnestorius: This is excellent news! Thank you for sharing! UaMaol (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are a very few exceedingly minor instances of uncited text at Featured article John Millington Synge; is anyone able to fill those in? I have not tagged those instances as I do not want to deface the article. See WP:URFA/2020. @Ceoil: SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for not tagging. Would you consider opening a discussion on the talk page and listing the instances of unsourced content? It's unlikely to be me that takes on the job BTW. Scolaire (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now cited, in case anyone wants to have a look. @Ceoil: again, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synge looks reasonable now for marking as "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020. Could Irish knowledgeable editors please have a look and comment on the article talk page if there are any outstanding deficiencies? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, I just noticed an edit to the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, for which one of the citations used is Gript. Given its stance and politics, I would suggest that it is not a relaible source in the same way that Russia Today and the Daily Mail is not. I've never ventured down the path of flagging a source before, is there anyone that might give me a hand in this? As it is quite specifically an Irish source, I wanted to see what other editors thought about it. Pinging @Spleodrach: @Guliolopez: as you might have feelings on this? Smirkybec (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

to "Irish English. So far mainly American support. Johnbod (talk) 02:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]