Arg vs Brazil Tag: New topic |
Warning: Three-revert rule. Tag: Twinkle |
||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
Best regards, [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 10:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
Best regards, [[User:Fma12|Fma12]] ([[User talk:Fma12|talk]]) 10:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== May 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Onorem|Onorem]] ([[User talk:Onorem|talk]]) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:42, 8 May 2024
Welcome Raúl Quintana Tarufetti!
I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Raúl,
I've taken a look at the articles you mentioned and the revversions by you and the other user are multiple so this turns a bit confusing for an editor who has not been involved in the discussion since it started.
Nevertheless Svarter is right when he states that the RSSSF (see page) is a reliable and good source, but it is updated up to 2008 so there are a lot of years missing. The FIFA source indicates 42 wins per side as of Nov 2023. The same result than Promiedos, another good site about statistics. The website Goal.com also indicates a 42-42 tie on wins.
As a result, I'm going to edit the page based on the sources cited. If Svartner reverts my edit, I'll open a discussion at his talk page and, if he does not change his attitude, I won't have any other option than reporting the case at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If I have to do it, I'll notify you asking for your feedback.
Best regards, Fma12 (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Onorem (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)