→FYI: new section Tag: Reverted |
Time for you to let bygones be bygones. This has all been dealt with via Arbcom. To paraphrase Louis XIV, you are not l'etat. And I think wikipedia should be far far far harsher on admins who attempt to assert themselves as such. Tags: Manual revert Reverted |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Luxofluxo unblocked}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 00:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Luxofluxo unblocked}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 00:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> |
||
:Welcome back! Let me know if you run into problems getting started again or need help. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">— [[User:Wugapodes|Wug·]][[User talk:Wugapodes|a·po·des]]</span> 23:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC) |
:Welcome back! Let me know if you run into problems getting started again or need help. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">— [[User:Wugapodes|Wug·]][[User talk:Wugapodes|a·po·des]]</span> 23:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
== FYI == |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Euexperttime]] [[User:Sro23|Sro23]] ([[User talk:Sro23|talk]]) 11:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:29, 10 July 2021
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg railway station has been accepted
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 13:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Luxofluxo, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Luxofluxo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC) |
Blocked as a sockpuppet
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Orologio_blu.svg/48px-Orologio_blu.svg.png)
Luxofluxo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #22084 was submitted on Jul 16, 2018 11:21:20. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 11:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Screwed up
Hey, Just Chilling. Writing here because I have no idea how to reply to the email or you directly. My first edit under this account was on 1 May 2018, which I believe (I may be out by 1 or 2 weeks either way) was within the 6 months standard offer anyway - I believe my last edit sock was end of November beginning of December (I did not note the exact date and am not sure where to go to find this out). I do not remember the account password of the "master" account and so could not request an unblock through that - I was also unclear about the process and whether it would be automatic or not. I won't lie that have found it confusing. I'm sorry. However, I believe my editing history on this account has shown I'm committed to editing on Wikipedia and being a good Wikipedian. Whilst I get that a transgression is a transgression, nonetheless, could the reviewers see that I don't wait another 6 months again in light of this. I would be grateful if you calculated the difference start of my edits and the 1 or 2 weeks off of the standard offer I was and perhaps doubled that as my probation time. Once again, I did not mean to create this mix up, and was scared to ask for clarification from Sro23 and others previously as I thought I'd just be banned again. My fault. Please don't take this as me being impertinent. All the best, Luxofluxo (talk) 23:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you look here you will see that your last main space edit was on 9 July 2018 so your SO period now runs until 9 January 2019. At that time any SO appeal will need to be via WP:UTRS. Any unblock would be of your master account and this sock will not be unblocked. I see no further use to which you might put this talk page so I am revoking your access to it. Just Chilling (talk) 00:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Luxofluxo unblocked
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Luxofluxo (talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction and a topic ban from European Schools. These restrictions may be appealed on-wiki after 6 months. For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim(talk) 00:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Luxofluxo unblocked
- Welcome back! Let me know if you run into problems getting started again or need help. — Wug·a·po·des 23:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)