Cannabis Indica

Page 1
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 350
BEYOND TRISAMBODO SCANDAL: HOW TAXPAYERS’
PERCEPTION AND KNOWLEDGE INFLUENCE THEIR
COMPLIANCE
Muslim Cendekiawan1); Saraswati Nirmala Suci2); Resi Ariyasa Qadri 3)*
1) 4132220067_muslim@pknstan.ac.id, Polytechnic of State Finance STAN
2) 4132220033_saras@pknstan.ac.id, Polytechnic of State Finance STAN
3) resi.ariyasa@pknstan.ac.id, Polytechnic of State Finance STAN
* for the corresponding author
Abstract
This study is aimed to predict and explain the impact of taxpayers' perceptions of the Directorate General of Taxes
and tax knowledge, moderated by taxpayer income level, on tax compliance, particularly in the aftermath of the
Rafael Alun Trisambodo scandal. A distinctive feature of this study is the employment of perceptions of the
Directorate General of Taxes as an independent variable, which is innovatively derived from text mining Twitter
data, alongside the application of ordinal data for the taxpayer income variable. Employing a survey methodology,
this research engaged with a diverse cohort of 133 taxpayer respondents. The analytical framework adopted herein
is the structural equation modeling analysis, which facilitates a comprehensive examination of the relationships
between the specified variables. The findings reveal a significant causality between taxpayers' tax knowledge and
their compliance behavior, positing that an enhanced understanding of tax-related matters invariably leads to greater
adherence to tax obligations. This outcome underscores the imperative for the Directorate General of Taxes to
intensify efforts in the realm of taxpayer socialization and education, aiming to augment levels of tax compliance.
The insights gleaned from this study are anticipated to serve as valuable inputs for the Directorate General of Taxes
in formulating strategies to bolster tax compliance among the populace.
Keywords: Compliance, Income, Knowledge, Perception, Tax
INTRODUCTION
Taxation constitutes the predominant source of revenue for the Indonesian state budget
(APBN), as evidenced by the 2023 fiscal projections, which set the tax revenue goal at IDR
1,718.0 trillion, accounting for 69,75% of the total anticipated state revenue (Kalventri &
Mulyani, 2022; Government of Indonesia, 2022). The Indonesian government maintains an
optimistic outlook regarding tax receipts for 2023, anticipating a growth rate of 6.8% compared
to the 2022 fiscal year (Ministry of Finance, 2023; Sitepu et.al., 2022). This expected growth is
underpinned by the resurgence of the domestic economy, augmented by an enhanced
contribution from the Value Added Tax (VAT) ensuing from the steadfast application of VAT
rate policies and the anticipated expansion of domestic demand (Ministry of Finance Team,
2022; Sitepu et.al., 2022). Nonetheless, tax compliance levels within a nation frequently pose
significant challenges to governmental authorities. Alm (2019) articulates that robust tax
compliance is crucial for the sustainability and equity of the tax framework. He argues that
diminished compliance rates can compromise government financing and erode public
confidence in tax administration systems (Alm, 2019; Lestari & Darmawan, 2023). Inadequate
tax compliance impedes developmental progress and curtails the government's capacity to
deliver essential public services effectively (Saputro & Meivira, 2020; Fitriah et.al., 2019).
As the paramount tax authority in Indonesia, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) is
entrusted with the critical responsibilities of devising and executing tax policies, as delineated
in Article 417 of the Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) No. 141/PMK.01/2022. This
regulation, which amends Minister of Finance Regulation No. 118/PMK.01/2021, outlines the
organizational structure and operational protocols of the Ministry of Finance, including the
mandate of the DGT. Within its operational purview, the DGT bears a significant obligation to
foster elevated levels of tax compliance among taxpayers—a cornerstone of its functional
agenda (Christian & Aribowo, 2021; Directore General of Taxes, 2022). This mandate
encompasses the execution of comprehensive monitoring, evaluation, and reporting
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 351
mechanisms within the tax domain (Rezkita et.al., 2019; Prakasa & Isfaatun, 2020). Such
oversight is aimed at ensuring taxpayers fulfill their fiscal duties accurately and punctually, a
task that underpins the effectiveness of the nation's tax system (Christian & Aribowo, 2021;
Sari et.al., 2022). Despite these structured efforts, the DGT has encountered formidable
obstacles in enhancing tax compliance rates in recent years. These challenges are compounded
by prevailing negative perceptions among the public regarding the tax system, posing additional
hurdles to the DGT's mission of ensuring compliance and bolstering public confidence in the
tax administration framework (Fitria & Supriyono, 2019; Yulianti & Kurniawan, 2019).
A noteworthy incident impacting public perceptions of the DGT is the Rafael Alun
Trisambodo (RAT) scandal, which unfolded in 2023 (Rachman, 2023a; Pardede, 2023). This
case entailed allegations of corrupt practices within the DGT, specifically the acceptance of
gratuities, highlighted by anomalies detected in the State Organizer's Asset and Wealth Report
(LHKPN) (Rachman, 2023b). The report flagged an ostensibly disproportionate asset valuation
for RAT, an echelon III official, amounting to IDR 56.1 billion, a figure perceived by the public
as excessively high, especially in comparison to the total declared assets of the Director General
of Taxes, Suryo Utomo, which stood at IDR 14.45 billion in the same reporting period (KPK,
2022a, 2022b). The revelation of this discrepancy has significantly marred the DGT's
reputation, engendering adverse public sentiment regarding the institution's integrity and
commitment to transparency (Rachman, 2023a; Pardede, 2023).
Conversely, the level of taxpayer income exerts a notable influence on tax compliance.
Empirical findings suggest that individuals within higher income brackets are generally
associated with greater compliance levels in contrast to their lower-income counterparts
(Kirchler et.al., 2008). This discrepancy may be attributed to the more substantial economic
sanctions and reputational consequences that high-income individuals are likely to encounter
should they fail to meet their tax obligations accurately and punctually. Moreover, there is a
tendency for individuals with elevated income levels to possess a more comprehensive
understanding of taxation, which positively correlates with tax compliance (Albab & Suwardi,
2021). Furthermore, Meidawati and Azmi (2019) assert that tax knowledge serves as a
foundational element influencing taxpayers' decision-making processes and the selection of
strategies to adhere to tax obligations. However, the literature presents varied conclusions
regarding the nexus between tax knowledge and taxpayer compliance, signaling the necessity
for further empirical investigation into these dynamics utilizing consistent variables.
This paper endeavors to scrutinize the impact of public perceptions of the DGT,
moderated by income levels and tax knowledge, on tax compliance in the aftermath of the RAT
scandal. The selection of variables is informed by attribution theory, which posits public
perception and tax knowledge as internal factors, whereas income is considered an external
factor influencing tax compliance. A quantitative methodology underlies this investigation,
employing a survey distributed among taxpayers across various Indonesian regions. A
distinctive feature of this study is the innovative use of public perceptions towards the DGT as
an independent variable, derived from text mining analysis of Twitter data. The outcomes of
this text mining process inform the construction of statements within the survey questionnaires.
Another novel aspect is the application of ordinal data to categorize taxpayer income levels.
This approach represents a methodological advancement in examining the nuances of taxpayer
behavior. The findings of this study are anticipated to enrich the academic corpus within the
field of taxation, particularly concerning facets of taxpayer compliance. Moreover, the insights
garnered from this research are poised to serve as a valuable resource for the DGT, potentially
informing strategies and initiatives designed to enhance tax compliance and address public
perceptions following high-profile cases such as the RAT incident.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 352
LITERATURE REVIEW
Attribution theory emerged to explain how to judge individuals differently, according
to certain behaviors (Robbins & Judge, 2008). Attribution theory is related to research in this
tax context, namely in terms of knowing what are the factors that influence the level of tax
compliance of taxpayer. One example of research in the tax field that specifically uses
attribution theory was conducted by Kaplan et.al. (1988). They succeeded in proving that the
intention to commit tax evasion can be strengthened by external factors. Thus, attribution theory
can explain that tax evasion behavior is not only caused by internal factors in the form of
taxpayer' own perceptions, but also by how external factors from the environment can influence
taxpayer.
Attribution theory, as a psychological framework, helps in understanding how
individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behavior. This theory
posits that individuals try to determine why people do what they do, attributing causes to
behaviors to understand the world around them. When applied to the context of tax compliance,
as discussed by Meidawati and Azmi (2019) and further elaborated by Marilyn et.al. (2022),
attribution theory can shed light on how taxpayers' knowledge—or lack thereof—shapes their
compliance behaviors. According to the theory, individuals make attributions based on internal
factors (such as personal characteristics or knowledge) and external factors (such as
environmental cues or societal pressures). Tax knowledge, as highlighted in the hypothesis
drawn from the research findings of Meidawati and Azmi (2019) and Marilyn et al. (2022), is
an internal factor that equips taxpayers with the necessary information to navigate their tax
obligations. This knowledge enables them to make informed decisions about their tax-related
behaviors, thus influencing their level of compliance. Wujarso et.al. (2020) explain that
although the implementation of tax obligations is one of the obligations of taxpayer as a citizen,
these actions will only be carried out if taxpayer have good tax knowledge. From this
description, the first hypothesis (H1) in this study is as follows: taxpayers’ knowledge has a
positive effect on taxpayers’ compliance.
Tax compliance is the action of taxpayer to fulfill their tax obligations in accordance
with the applicable tax regulations in a country (Syah & Krisdiawati, 2017). Taxpayer
compliance can be divided into formal and material tax compliance. Formal tax compliance is
compliance as stipulated in tax regulations. Meanwhile, material tax compliance is a condition
in which taxpayer comply with all material provisions of taxation (Thahir et.al., 2021).
Taxpayer compliance is related to tax payments listed in the state budget to support national
development (Utami & Osesoga, 2017). Latief et.al. (2020) connects compliance with time,
taxpayers are obedient if they fulfill their tax obligations on time. Based on the description
presented above, it can be concluded that tax compliance is the willingness of taxpayer to fulfill
all their tax obligations by applicable tax regulations.
The RAT case began when his son Mario Dandy Satriyo (20) assaulted a teenager called
Cristalino David Ozora Latumahina (17) until he lost consciousness on Monday, February 20,
2023 at 8:30 pm in Pesanggrahan, South Jakarta. This case was followed by the alleged
concealment of evidence in the form of a Rubicon car which turned out to have a fake police
number. This case then became a public concern, one of which was because RAT, who was a
civil servant in the DGT, turned out to have abundant assets that were considered unreasonable
and not in accordance with what he had disclosed in his LHKPN. This made Sri Mulyani
Indrawati, the Minister of Finance, two days after the incident made a statement through social
media which criticized the luxurious lifestyle carried out by the Ministry of Finance employees.
Based on Tempo and CNBC, the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Finance
conducted an examination of RAT and he stated that he was ready to provide all the necessary
information regarding all his assets. The Minister of Finance also then removed RAT from his
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 353
duties and structural positions. The examination was also carried out by cooperating with
related agencies such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan
Korupsi/KPK), Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis (Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis
Transaksi Keuangan/PPATK), and others. Furthermore, he began to be examined by the KPK
at the Merah Putih Building on March 1, 2023 to provide clarification about his assets. The
examination by the KPK entered the investigation stage and he was named as a suspect in
receiving gratuities on March 30, 2023.
The attribution theory proposes that when taxpayers perceive the DGT positively, they
are likely to attribute their compliance behavior to intrinsic motivations, such as a sense of civic
duty or moral obligation, reinforced by their trust and confidence in the tax authority. This
internal attribution process emphasizes that compliance is not solely driven by external factors,
such as fear of penalties or enforcement actions, but also by taxpayers’ internalized beliefs and
perceptions about the tax authority. The perception that each person has in seeing a problem
around him is certainly different, so that this perception becomes an important psychological
aspect for a human being. Perception is an assumption or information owned by a person that
comes from past experiences and is felt by that person, as well as a person's desire to make
decisions from information obtained from others (Felicia & Erawati, 2017). Robbins and Judge
(2008) stated that perception is a process when each individual organizes and interprets their
sense impressions in giving meaning to their environment. In addition, Rakhmat (2007) stated,
perception is knowledge about things, events, or relationships that arise after analyzing and
interpreting information and messages. From this explanation, it can be concluded that the
perception possessed by each individual can be different, which can be influenced by the
surrounding environment. DGT is an Echelon I under the Ministry of Finance. PMK Number
217/PMK.01/2018 concerning Organization and Work Procedures of the Ministry of
Financestated thay DGT has the task of formulating and implementing policies in the field of
taxation in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. As it is known, tax is the
largest source of revenue for Indonesia. Therefore, DGT needs to maintain public trust so that
tax collection from the public can be done more optimally. Public perception of DGT is one of
the factors determining public attitude towards taxes. Research conducted by Mahadianto and
Astuti (2017) revealed that low public trust in tax authorities and officers reduces taxpayer
compliance. From the description above, the second hypothesis (H2) can be formulated:
taxpayers’ perception on DGT has a positive effect on their compliance.
According to attribution theory, individuals attribute their actions either to internal
dispositions or to external circumstances. This theory provides insight into how the combination
of a taxpayer's income level (an external, situational factor) and their perceptions of the tax
authority (an internal factor) can jointly impact their tax compliance behavior. Income is the
amount of money or value obtained by a person either from effort or energy, movable or
immovable goods or assets, rights to periodic payments, and additional assets during the
calendar year, unless it can be proven by taxpayer otherwise (Fadilah et.al., 2021). In addition,
the definition of income according to Law (Undang-Undang/UU) Number 36 of 2008 Article
4 paragraph (1), has several elements (Naharto & Tjondro, 2014): any additional economic
capacity, received/obtained by taxpayer, also both originating from Indonesia and outside
Indonesia. Tax adheres to the principle of worldwide income so that income subject to tax is
not viewed from where it comes from, which can be used for consumption or increase the assets
of the taxpayer concerned, and income is used to meet daily needs or saved in one year plus net
worth, will be taxable. Research conducted by Ezer and Ghozali (2017) shows that income has
a positive effect on tax compliance. In the study, it was proven that the higher the income
(profit) received by the company, the higher the tax compliance. In addition, the results of this
study are also supported by research by Amran (2018) which shows the same conclusion. Based
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 354
on this description, the third hypothesis (H3) is determined as follows: income level strengthens
the positive effect of taxpayers’ perception on their compliance.
METHODS
This investigation constitutes applied research, endeavoring to harness extant
knowledge and empirical findings to address tangible challenges or devise practicable solutions
pertinent to real-world applications or specific contexts. According to Cooper and Schindler
(2006), applied research is instrumental in tackling immediate issues confronting practitioners
within professional settings, necessitating expedient resolutions. The primary focus of this
research genre is the formulation of problem-solving strategies. The study adopts a positivist
paradigm, which, as delineated by Sekaran and Bougie (2016), subscribes to the philosophical
standpoint that a singular objective reality exists. This paradigm privileges experimentation as
its cornerstone methodological approach, facilitating the examination of causal relationships
through controlled manipulation and systematic observation. The inferential process
underpinning this research is characterized by deductive reasoning. This approach commences
with the establishment of a theoretical framework, followed by the formulation of hypotheses.
Subsequent empirical testing and analysis are undertaken to ascertain whether the observed
outcomes corroborate the initial theoretical propositions. This deductive trajectory ensures that
the research findings are rigorously validated against the foundational theoretical constructs.
The methodological framework employed in this investigation is a mono-method
quantitative approach, operationalized through the deployment of a questionnaire strategy
facilitated by Google Forms for the acquisition of primary data. The survey garnered
participation from individual taxpayers, with the questionnaire disseminated across various
Telegram channels. Only responses deemed valid were incorporated into the dataset for
analysis. The instrument utilized a Likert Scale ranging from one to six to gauge respondent
attitudes, with scale 1 denoting 'Strongly Disagree', scale 2 'Disagree', scale 3 'Somewhat
Disagree', scale 4 'Somewhat Agree', scale 5 'Agree', and scale 6 'Strongly Agree'. This nuanced
scale allows for a comprehensive assessment of respondent perceptions across a spectrum of
agreement levels. Subsequent analysis of the collected data was conducted employing statistical
techniques, specifically structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis, executed via the Smart
PLS software. This analytical approach facilitates the exploration of complex relationships
between variables, thereby enabling a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing
taxpayer behavior and compliance.
The operationalization of the dependent variable, taxpayer compliance, within this
research is informed by a suite of indicators derived from scholarly sources pertinent to the
subject matter. These indicators are methodically selected to encapsulate the multifaceted nature
of taxpayer compliance, comprising the following dimensions: (1) Voluntary Registration:
taxpayers' propensity to voluntarily register as taxpayers, indicative of proactive compliance
behavior (Christie & Hastuti, 2021); (2) Independent Calculation: the accuracy and integrity
with which taxpayers calculate their tax obligations, reflecting their commitment to honest
disclosure (Suhendri, 2015); (3) Payment Adherence: the diligence of taxpayers in remitting
the precise amount of tax due, demonstrating adherence to statutory requirements (Wardani &
Rumiyatun, 2017); (4) Timely Reporting: the punctuality of taxpayers in submitting tax
returns, a key aspect of procedural compliance (Meidawati & Azmi, 2019); (5) Intrinsic
Motivation: the extent to which taxpayers fulfill their tax obligations driven by a sense of
responsibility, rather than coercion, underscoring the ethical dimension of compliance
(Suherman et al., 2015). These indicators collectively provide a comprehensive framework for
assessing taxpayer compliance, enabling a nuanced analysis of the factors influencing tax
compliance behaviors within the study's scope.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 355
The construct of tax knowledge, serving as an independent variable within this study, is
delineated through a series of indicators informed by extant literature, encapsulating various
dimensions of fiscal literacy. These indicators are as follows: (1) Media-Derived Tax
Information: the extent of taxpayers' familiarity with tax-related information disseminated
through mass media outlets (Suhendri, 2015); (2) Awareness of Individual Tax Rates:
Taxpayers' understanding of the specific tax rates applicable to individuals (Suhendri, 2015); 3.
Comprehension of Personal Income Tax Calculation: the depth of knowledge regarding the
methodology for calculating personal income tax (Christie & Hastuti, 2021); (4) Familiarity
with Personal Income Tax Return Filing Procedures: Taxpayers' awareness of the procedural
aspects involved in filing personal income tax returns (Suhendri, 2015); (5) Understanding of
Penalties for Non-compliance: knowledge concerning the sanctions imposed for delinquent
tax payments and filings (Wardani & Rumiyatun, 2017). In parallel, indicators pertaining to the
independent variable of public perception towards the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) are
derived via text mining from Twitter (now referred to as “X”).
Table 1. Income Range in the Questionnaire
Total Monthly Income
Group
Rp0 to Rp5,000,000.00
1
Rp5,000,001.00 to Rp10,000,000.00
2
Rp10,000,001.00 to Rp20,000,000.00
3
Rp20,000,001.00 to Rp35,000,000.00
4
Rp35,000,001.00 to Rp55,000,000.00
5
≥ Rp55,000,001.00
6
Source: Author's Processed Results (2023)
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework
Source: Author's Processed Results (2023)
The insights garnered through this analytical process inform the construction of
questionnaire items, encapsulating public sentiments towards the DGT. The income level
variable is operationalized through data collected via questionnaires, generating ordinal data
through the categorization of respondents into predefined income brackets. This methodology
facilitates a structured analysis of the relationship between income levels and tax-related
behaviors and perceptions. The framework and model used in this study is as follows.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 356
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From the questionnaires distributed, there are 133 respondents. Descriptive statistics for
each variable in the study are contained in Table 2. From the results of the descriptive analysis,
all variables have a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 5 or 6, this figure shows that
the answers of the respondents are very varied. The taxpayer perception variable has an average
of 4.189, which means that the perception that taxpayer have of the DGT tends to be good with
a standard deviation of 1.576. Taxpayer tax knowledge has an average value of 4.927. This is
evidence that taxpayer tax knowledge is good in carrying out their tax obligations. The standard
deviation for taxpayer tax knowledge shows 1.215. The taxpayer compliance variable has an
average value of 5.137 and a standard deviation of 1.009. This value indicates that taxpayer
compliance is high. The income variable has an average value and a median value of 2, which
means that most respondents have an income of IDR 5,000,001.00 to IDR 10,000,000.00. The
standard deviation of income is 0.785.
The data obtained from the questionnaire that has been distributed to respondents is
tested for validity first. Indicators are said to be valid if they have a loading factor > 0.7
(Hussein, 2015). Indicators that have a loading factor of not more than 0.7 are not included in
the further data testing process. The results of the validity test are in Table 3. After data
processing, the validity test results for the variables of taxpayer knowledge, taxpayer
compliance, and taxpayer income show valid results on all items. There is one of the five items
on the taxpayer perception variable that has a value of less than 0.7 so that one item is not used
in the further data processing process. Furthermore, a reliability test was carried out to test
whether each variable used in this study was consistent and reliable (Erayanti et.al., 2023). Each
latent variable is called reliable if the Cronbach’s Alpha or Composite Reliability value of the
reliability test results is greater than 0.7 (Hussein, 2015). The results of the reliability test on
the variables in the study are contained in Table 4. Based on the results in the table, it can be
concluded that the Cronbach’s Alpha value for the Taxpayer Tax Knowledge variable is 0.929,
Taxpayer Perception is 0.905, Taxpayer Compliance is 0.907, and Taxpayer Income is 1.000.
The results of hypothesis testing in the study are in Table 5.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics
Variable
N Min Max Mean Median Std. Dev.
Taxpayer Tax Knowledge (INF)
133
1
6 4,927
5
1,215
Taxpayer Perception (PSP)
133
1
6 4,189
5
1,576
Taxpayer Compliance (PTH)
133
1
6 5,137
5
1,009
Taxpayer Income (PHS)
133
1
5
2
5
0,785
Table 3. Validity Test Results
Item
Taxpayer Tax
Knowledge
(INF)
Taxpayer
Perception
(PSP)
Taxpayer
Compliance
(PTH)
Taxpayer
Income (PHS)
INF1
0,757
INF2
0,917
INF3
0,931
INF4
0,937
INF5
0,869
PSP2
0,917
PSP3
0,922
PSP4
0,867
PSP5
0,868
PTH1
0,798
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 357
PTH2
0,889
PTH3
0,913
PTH4
0,869
PTH5
0,794
PHS
1,000
Table 4. Reliability Test Results
Variable
Cronbach’s
Alpha
Composite
Reliability
Description
Taxpayer Tax Knowledge (INF)
0,929
0,947 Reliable
Taxpayer Perception (PSP)
0,905
0,930 Reliable
Taxpayer Compliance (PTH)
0,907
0,931 Reliable
Taxpayer Income (PHS)
1,000
1,000 Reliable
Source: Author’s Processed Results (2023)
Table 5. Hypothesis Test Results
Relationship
between variables
Original
Sample
Sample
Mean
T Stat P Values
R2
Adj. R2
INF → PTH
0,812
0,819 14,861
0,000
0,626
5
0,612
1,576
PSP → PTH
0,032
0,036 0,558
0,289
PHS → PTH
-0,044
-0,048 0,707
0,240
5
1,009
PSP*PHS → PTH
0,039
0,038 0,871
0,186
5
0,785
Source: Author's Processed Results (2023)
Hypothesis testing in this study uses a significant level (alpha) 5%. If the P value (sig)
is less than alpha, it means that there is an influence between variables. The test was conducted
using structural equation model (SEM) analysis to determine whether there was a significant
influence or not between the independent variables on taxpayer compliance and the moderating
effect of taxpayer income variables on the relationship between taxpayer perceptions and
taxpayer compliance which could not only be resolved by multiple linear regression analysis.
The results of testing H1 show that tax knowledge has a significant positive effect on
taxpayer compliance. This conclusion is in accordance with the results of hypothesis testing in
Table 5 which shows P Values < 0.05 and the original sample which has a positive value. This
indicates that H2 is accepted. The results of this study are in line with the results of research by
Kamil (2015), Suhendri (2015), Firmansyah and Putu (2018), also Wujarso et.al. (2020), but
not in line with Wardani and Rumiyatun (2017), Fitrianingsih et.al. (2018), Meidawati and
Azmi (2019), Rioni and Saraswati (2018), Tambun and Muhtiar (2019), also Marilyn et.al.
(2022).
Although DGT has provided facilities and infrastructure to improve tax knowledge, it
has not had an effect on all levels of taxpayer because DGT only focuses on socializing tax
knowledge in certain sectors (Firmansyah & Putu, 2018). The results of this test are in line with
the statement Kamil (2015) that tax knowledge and understanding of tax provisions and
regulations will result in an increase in the level of taxpayer compliance and will simultaneously
reduce the level of corruption. Conditions that can be related to the context of the subject of this
study, it is suspected that taxpayer understand that the taxes they deposit to the state are used
solely for the welfare of society. In addition, tax provisions and regulations that are socialized
with various packages make it easier for taxpayer to understand so that fulfilling their tax
obligations becomes easier.
The positive relationship between tax knowledge and taxpayer compliance align with
the theoretical frameworks of tax compliance behavior proposed by various scholars (e.g.,
Allingham & Sandmo, 1972; Torgler, 2002). According to these frameworks, individuals'
compliance decisions are influenced not only by their perceptions of enforcement measures and
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 358
penalties but also by their understanding of tax laws and the fairness of the tax system.
Therefore, individuals with higher levels of tax knowledge may perceive tax obligations as
more legitimate and may be more inclined to fulfill their tax responsibilities voluntarily. Based
on attribution theory, the knowledge an individual has will influence them in thinking and
acting. This knowledge is an internal factor in making attributions. The more knowledge a
person has, the stronger the attribution will be. In the context of taxation, tax knowledge
possessed by taxpayers is the basis for attribution of taxpayer compliance.
Furthermore, the positive effect of tax knowledge on taxpayer compliance underscores
the importance of taxpayer education initiatives and outreach programs implemented by tax
authorities (Wardani & Wati, 2018). By providing accessible and comprehensive tax education
materials, workshops, and seminars, tax authorities can empower taxpayers to enhance their
understanding of tax matters, thereby promoting greater compliance with tax laws (Sukmana et
al., 2023). Moreover, targeted educational interventions can address specific areas of
misunderstanding or confusion among taxpayers, leading to more effective compliance
outcomes (OECD, 2004).
However, it is essential to recognize that while tax knowledge plays a crucial role in
shaping taxpayer compliance behavior, other factors may also influence compliance decisions.
For instance, individuals' perceptions of tax fairness, attitudes toward taxation, socio-economic
status, and past experiences with tax authorities can all contribute to their compliance behavior
(Braithwaite, 2003; Wenzel, 2002). Therefore, future research could explore the interplay
between tax knowledge and these contextual factors to develop a more comprehensive
understanding of taxpayer compliance dynamics.
The results of testing H2 show that public perception after the RAT case has no influence
on taxpayer compliance, according to the results of hypothesis testing in Table 5 which shows
P Value > 0.05 which means H2 is rejected. This conclusion is not in line with research by
Mahadianto and Astuti (2017) which explains that public perception or trust in taxation
authorities has no positive effect (negative effect) on taxpayer compliance. The questionnaire
results show that the public still has a positive perception of the DGT, despite the RAT case.
However, in the context of this study, public perception does not affect taxpayer compliance.
Corruption crime is something that has the potential to cause a loss of public trust, so that
taxpayer compliance will decrease. The image of DGT that prioritizes integrity in its business
process is potentially lost due to the emergence of corruption cases by unscrupulous DGT
employees. However, the existence of RAT case does not make respondents generalize that all
DGT employees are corrupt. The next task of DGT is to maintain public trust that the tax money
deposited to the state will be managed properly.
The results of testing H2 implies that public trust of DGT is significantly higher than the
impact of RAT case. Regarding attribution theory, the results of testing H2 show that the
impression that taxpayers have towards DGT which has been formed over a long period of time
cannot immediately change due to a sudden event. This means that there is no external
attribution due to the RAT case on taxpayer compliance.
There are several factors that can explain DGT’s success in preserving their images: (1)
DGT can successfully maintain their image by remaining transparent and providing clear
communication to the public regarding cases like RAT's. By offering accurate and open
information, DGT can build public trust that they are committed to upholding law and justice
(Xiong et al., 2019). (2) Despite cases involving prominent figures, DGT demonstrated that
they enforce the law consistently and impartially, regardless of social status or wealth
(Vitkauskas & Junevicius, 2018). This helps uphold the institution's integrity and reinforce
DGT's image as a fair and resolute tax enforcement agency. (3) DGT not only focuses on law
enforcement but also on taxpayer education and empowerment. Through tax education
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 359
campaigns and better services, DGT has increased taxpayer awareness of their obligations and
encourages voluntary compliance (Kwok & Yip, 2018). (4) DGT shows a strong commitment
to reforming the tax system. This includes improvements in service, regulatory clarity, and
efforts to reduce bureaucracy. Thus, DGT has strengthened its legitimacy in the eyes of the
public and provides an additional incentive for taxpayers to comply with the rules (Cuadrado-
Ballesteros & Bisogno, 2021). (5) DGT has been actively involved in resolving RAT's case.
This includes thorough investigation, taking appropriate action, and ensuring that justice is
served (Audretsch et al., 2022). Thus, DGT demonstrated that they do not tolerate violations
and that justice will be upheld.
The results of testing H3 show that income level does not successfully moderate the
effect of public perception on taxpayer compliance. This conclusion is in accordance with the
results of hypothesis testing in Table 5 which shows P Value > 0.05 which means H3 is rejected.
Income level is an external factor, while public perception is an internal factor in attribution
theory. Public perception is attached to each individual who is different in perceiving DGT.
Meanwhile, income level affects the amount of tax paid by taxpayer. Thus, the higher the
income level does not affect taxpayer compliance in fulfilling their tax obligations based on
their personal perceptions.
According to attribution theory, income level is included as internal factors because the
amount of income comes from within the individual. The income level can affect people's
perceptions of a matter as in the research of Yanti et.al. (2017) also Cupian and Najmi (2020),
but based on this study, income level has no such effect on taxpayer perception of DGT. This
may indicate that taxpayer perceptions of the DGT may be more influenced by various other
attribution factors, such as the level of exposure to information obtained from various existing
media, the age of taxpayers, and the services provided by the DGT. Therefore, in future studies
researchers can use other variables in examining the effect of taxpayer perceptions on tax
compliance.
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
The synthesis of findings from the present study elucidates that taxpayer tax knowledge
exerts a positive and substantive influence on taxpayer compliance. This correlation signifies
that an augmentation in tax-related knowledge among taxpayers is directly associated with an
enhanced propensity towards fulfilling tax obligations. Conversely, the investigation reveals
that taxpayers' perceptions subsequent to the Rafael Alun Trisambodo (RAT) incident do not
significantly impact compliance levels, nor does income level serve as a moderating variable
in this dynamic. From a policy perspective, the implications of these findings are multifaceted.
For the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT), the results underscore the paramount importance
of initiatives aimed at enriching taxpayers' fiscal literacy. Such knowledge empowerment
strategies are pivotal in fostering a culture of compliance and facilitating voluntary adherence
to tax mandates. Furthermore, the DGT is encouraged to undertake measures to preserve and
enhance its reputation, ensuring that public perceptions of the institution remain favorable,
which is integral to maintaining taxpayer trust and compliance. For the broader community, this
research serves as a catalyst for heightened awareness regarding the significance of tax
education. It behooves members of the public to actively seek contemporary information on tax
legislation and guidelines, thereby enhancing their understanding and willingness to comply
with tax obligations voluntarily. This proactive engagement with tax-related knowledge not
only contributes to individual compliance but also bolsters the collective efficacy of the tax
system, underscoring the reciprocal relationship between informed citizenry and fiscal
governance.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 360
This investigation acknowledges certain constraints that may impinge upon the
generalizability and depth of its findings. Primarily, the scope of this study was circumscribed
by a relatively modest sample size, a consequence of temporal limitations impacting the
dissemination and retrieval of questionnaires. Furthermore, the demographic composition of
respondents exhibited a lack of diversity, with a preponderance of participants from specific
age and income brackets. The analytical focus was confined to a select set of variables, namely,
taxpayer tax knowledge, income, and perceptions, thereby precluding a comprehensive
exploration of the myriad factors potentially influencing taxpayer compliance. For future
inquiries into this domain, it is recommended that research designs incorporate a more
expansive and heterogenous sample, both in terms of respondent quantity and demographic
diversity. Such methodological enhancements would facilitate a more nuanced understanding
of compliance behaviors across different taxpayer segments. Additionally, the integration of
alternative variables into the research framework is advised to broaden the investigative lens,
thereby unearthing new dimensions of taxpayer compliance and contributing novel insights to
the academic discourse on fiscal governance.
REFERENCES
Albab, F. N. U., & Suwardi, E. (2021). The Effect of Tax Knowledge on Voluntary Tax
Compliance with Trust as a Mediating Variable: A Study on Micro, Small, and Medium
Enterprises (MSMEs). The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 24(03).
https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.528
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal
of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.
Alm, J. (2019). Can Indonesia Reform Its Tax System? Problems and Options (1906; Tulane
Economics Working Paper ).
Amran. (2018). Pengaruh Sanksi Perpajakan, Tingkat Pendapatan, dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak
terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi (Studi Kasus Kantor Pelayanan Pajak
Pratama Makasar Utara). Atensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 1(1), 1–15.
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Chowdhury, F., & Desai, S. (2022). Necessity or opportunity?
Government size, tax policy, corruption, and implications for entrepreneurship. Small
Business Economics, 58(4), 2025–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00497-2
Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with Tax Authorities: Motivational Postures and
Noncompliant
Actions.
Global
Business
Regulation,
207–237.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251786547
Christian, F. F., & Aribowo, I. (2021). Pengawasan Kepatuhan Perpajakan Wajib Pajak
Strategis Di Kpp Pratama Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review),
5(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i2.1320
Christie, A. A. M., & Hastuti, P. R. (2021). Tax Compliance WP OP pada Masa Pandemi.
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2006). Metode Riset Bisnis. PT Media Global Edukasi.
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Bisogno, M. (2021). Public sector accounting reforms and the
quality of governance. Public Money and Management, 41(2), 107–117.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1724665
Cupian, C., & Najmi, N. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Persepsi
Masyarakat Terhadap Wakaf Uang di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 6(2),
151. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v6i2.1045
Erayanti, F., Basri, Y. M., & Azkina, N. (2023). Good Governance Pemerintah Desa: Apakah
Dipengaruhi Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi?
Substansi: Sumber Artikel Akuntansi Auditing Dan Keuangan, 6(2), 12–26.
https://doi.org/10.35837/subs.v6i2.1257
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 361
Ezer, E., & Ghozali. (2017). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendapatan, Tarif Pajak, Denda Pajak, dan
Probabilitas Pemeriksaan Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak. Diponegoro Journal of
Accounting, 6(3), 1–13.
Fadilah, L., Noermansyah, A. L., & Krisdiyawati, K. (2021). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendapatan,
Penurunan Tarif, Dan Perubahan Cara Pembayaran Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak
UMKM
Masa
Pandemi
Covid-19.
Owner,
5(2),
450–459.
https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i2.487
Felicia, I., & Erawati, T. (2017). Pengaruh Sistem Perpajakan, Sanksi Perpajakan, dan Tarif
Pajak terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Etika Penggelapan Pajak (Studi Kasus di
Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Jurnal Kajian Bisnis, 25(2), 226–234.
Firmansyah, A., & Putu, I. (2018). The Effect of Tax Knowledge Reward and Enforcement
Strategies on SMEs Tax Compliance Behavior. 21–28. https://doi.org/10.15224/978-1-
63248-160-3-22
Fitria, P. A., & Supriyono, E. (2019). Pengaruh Pemahaman Peraturan Perpajakan, Persepsi
Tarif Pajak, Dan Keadilan Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak.
ECONBANK: Journal of Economics and Banking, 1(1), 47–54.
https://doi.org/10.35829/econbank.v1i1.7
Fitriah, E. A., Iskandar, Z., Srisayekti, W., & Abidin, Z. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Psikologis
sebagai Determinan Kepatuhan Pajak: Studi Eksplorasi pada Wajib Pajak. Psympathic :
Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i1.4701
Fitrianingsih, F., Sudarno, & Kurrohman, T. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Pengetahuan
Perpajakan, Pelayanan Fiskus Dan Sanksi Denda Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dalam
Membayar Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Perdesaan Dan Perkotaan Di Kota Pasuruan. E-
Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(1), 100–104.
Forum on Tax Administration Compliance Subgroup, OECD. (2004). Compliance Risk
Management: Managing and Improving Tax Compliance. Centre for Tax Policy and
Administration, OECD.
Hussein, A. S. (2015). Penelitian bisnis dan manajemen menggunakan partial least squares
(PLS) dengan smartPLS 3.0. Jurusan Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis,
Universitas
Brawijaya.
https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=5786f4c94048544b3332e123
&assetKey=AS:383572759334914@1468462280965
Kalventri, M., & Mulyani. (2022). Keberadaan Profitabilitas, Biaya Operasional Dan
Leverage Terhadap Pajak Penghasilan Badan Pada Perusahaan Publik Sektor Kesehatan.
Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v11i1.857
Kamil, N. I. (2015). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Knowledge, Tax Penalties and Tax
Authorities Services on the Tax Complience: (Survey on the Individual Taxpayer at
Jabodetabek & Bandung). In Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org
ISSN (Vol. 6, Issue 2). Online. www.iiste.org
Kaplan, S. E., Reckers, P. M. J., & Roark, S. J. (1988). An Attribution Theory Analysis of Tax
Evasion Related Judgements. Accounting Organizations and Society, 13(4), 371–379.
Kementerian Keuangan. (2023, July 11). Perkuat Reformasi, Pemerintah Optimis Target Pajak
Tercapai. Berita Utama Kementerian Keuangan. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-
publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Perkuat-Reformasi-Capai-Target-Pajak
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced Versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The
“Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 362
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2022a). Pengumuman Laporan Harta Kekayaan
Penyelenggara Negara a.n. Rafael Alun Trisambodo Tahun 2021. In e-LHKPN. Komisi
Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2022b). Pengumuman Laporan Kekayaan Harta
Penyelenggara Negara a.n. Suryo Utomo Tahun 2021. In e-LHKPN. Komisi
Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Kwok, B. Y. S., & Yip, R. W. Y. (2018). Is Tax Education Good or Evil for Boosting Tax
Compliance? Evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Economic Journal, 32(4), 359–386.
https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12163
Latief, S., Zakaria, J., & Mapparenta. (2020). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Kepada Pemerintah,
Kebijakan Insentif Pajak dan Manfaat Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Centerof
Economic Student Journal, 3(3), 270–289.
Lestari, U. P., & Darmawan, D. (2023). Upaya Mewujudkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak yang
Lebih Baik: Peran Pengetahuan Perpajakan dan Lokus Kendali Internal. Jurnal Simki
Economic, 6(1), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.29407/jse.v6i1.387
Mahadianto, M. Y., & Astuti, A. D. (2017). Privillage Tax Payer, Sosialisasi Pajak, dan
Kepercayaan pada Otoritas Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 1(1), 77–
86. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/jka
Marilyn, Amrie Firmansyah, & Estralita Trisnawati. (2022). Peran Moderasi Teknologi
Informasi Dalam Hubungan Antara Pengetahuan Pajak, Sanksi Pajak dan Kepatuhan
Pajak. In Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Vol. 6, Issue 1). www.djppr.kemenkeu.go.id
Meidawati, N., & Azmi, M. N. (2019). Factors Influencing the Compliance of Taxpayers.
Journal of Contemporary Acoounting, 1(1), 26–37.
Naharto, M. J., & Tjondro, E. (2014). Analisis Tujuan Pemungutan serta Pengertian
Penghasilan Menurut Perpajakan dan Persepuluhan bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Tax
& Accounting Review, 4(1), 1–14. www.sindonews.com
Pardede, R. K. B. (2023, March 2). Kasus Rafael Dapat Berimbas pada Penurunan Kepatuhan
Membayar Pajak. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2023/03/02/kasus-
rafael-dapat-berimbas-kepada-penurunan-kepatuhan-masyarakat-bayar-pajak
Peraturan Presiden No.130 Tahun 2022 Tentang Rincian Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja
Negara TA 2023 (2022).
PMK Nomor 141/PMK.01/2022 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor
118/PMK.01/2021 Tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Keuangan (2018).
PMK Nomor 217/PMK.01/2018 Tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Keuangan
(2018). www.peraturan.go.id
Prakasa, T. Z., & Isfaatun, E. (2020). Perkembangan Perpajakan di Indonesia. Kajian Ekonomi
Dan Bisnis, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.51277/keb.v15i1.69
Rachman, A. (2023a, February 24). Kasus Rafael Bikin Warga Ogah Lapor SPT, Sri Mulyani
Bereaksi. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230224114503-4-
416691/kasus-rafael-bikin-warga-ogah-lapor-spt-sri-mulyani-bereaksi
Rachman, A. (2023b, April 4). Kronologi Kasus RAT, dari PNS Berharta Jumbo hingga Dibui
KPK. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20230404080107-4-
427072/kronologi-kasus-rat-dari-pns-berharta-jumbo-hingga-dibui-kpk
Rakhmat, J. (2007). Psikologi Komunikasi (T. Surjaman, Ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rezkita, B., Andreswari, R., & Hanafi, R. (2019). Analisis Perancangan Enterprise
Architecture Fungsi Pelaporan Wajib Pajak Bendaharawan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak
Menggunakan Togaf Adm. EProceedings of Engineering, 1914–1927.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 363
Rioni, Y. S., & Saraswati, D. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat
Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi di Lingkungan Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama
Medan Barat. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis & Publik, 9(1), 160–174.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Salemba Empat.
Saputro, R., & Meivira, F. (2020). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan Pemilik, Praktik Akuntansi
dan Persepsi atas Insentif Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak UMKM. Jurnal EMBA : Jurnal
Riset
Ekonomi,
Manajemen,
Bisnis
Dan
Akuntansi,
8(4).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v8i4.31308
Sari, D. K., Fitrianty, R., & Rahayu, S. (2022). Pengaruh Edukasi, Pengawasan Dan
Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di KPP Pratama
Surabaya Genteng. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 6304–6320.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.9293
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach
(7th ed.). Wiley & Sons.
Sitepu, R. K. K., Mahesa, R., & Mustikawati, R. (2022). Kajian terhadap Rancangan Undang-
Undang Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Tahun 2023 (A. Masruroh, Ed.).
Widina Bhakti Persada.
Suhendri, D. (2015). Pengaruh Pengatahuan, Tarif Pajak, dan Sanksi Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan
Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi yang Melakukan Kegiatan Usaha dan Pekerjaan Bebas di Kota
Padang (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kota Padang).
Suherman, M., Almunawwaroh, M., & Marliana, R. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Filling
terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dalam Penyampaian Surat Pemberitahuan (SPT)
Tahunan pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kota Tasikmalaya. Media Riset Akuntansi
Auditing & Informasi, 15(1), 49–64.
Sukmana, S. U. T., Mardi, R. T., & Niravita, A. (2023). Optimalisasi Pemungutan Pajak Daerah
Melalui Penerapan Peraturan Undang-Undang BPHTB: Tantangan dan Peluang. Civilia:
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(6), 190–206.
Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor SE-05/PJ/2022 Tentang Pengawasan Kepatuhan
Wajib Pajak DJP (2022).
Syah, A. L. N., & Krisdiawati. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan
Wajib Pajak dalam Membayar Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Empiris pada Kantor
UPPD/Samsat Brebes). Jurnal AKSI (Akuntansi Dan Sistem Informasi), 2(1), 65–77.
Tambun, S., & Muhtiar, I. (2019). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan dan Penerapan E-System
Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak yang Dimoderasi oleh Technology Acceptance Model.
Media
Akuntansi
Perpajakan,
4(1),
1–15.
http://journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id/index.php/MAP
Tempo.co. (2023, March 31). Kronologi Lengkap Kasus Rafael Alun: Dari Kasus
Penganiayaan
hingga
Jadi
Tersangka
KPK.
Tempo.Co.
https://metro.tempo.co/read/1709497/kronologi-lengkap-kasus-rafael-alun-dari-kasus-
penganiayaan-hingga-jadi-tersangka-kpk
Thahir, A. N., Karyadi, I., & Azmi, Y. U. (2021). Pengaruh Perubahan Tarif, Metode
Penghitungan, dan Modernisasi Sistem Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM
dengan Keadilan Pajak sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Analisa Akutansi Dan
Perpajakan, 5(2), 160–175.
Tim Kementerian Keuangan. (2022). Advertorial RAPBN 2023 (Direktorat Penyusun APBN,
Ed.). Kementerian Keuangan.
Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking To Theorists and Searching for Facts: Tax Morale and Tax
Compliance In Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657–683.
EDUCORETAX
Volume 4 No.3, 2024
Page 364
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-
Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan (2008).
Utami, A. P., & Osesoga, M. S. (2017). Analisa Faktor-Faktor yang Memperngaruhi
Penggunaan E-Filing Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Ultima Accounting, 9(2), 15–32.
Vitkauskas, K., & Junevicius, A. (2018). Supervision and control of the implementation of the
law on the coordination of public and private interests in civil service: Problematic aspects.
Public
Policy
and
Administration,
17(1),
141–155.
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.17.1.20616
Wardani, D. K., & Rumiyatun. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Wajib Pajak, Kesadaran Wajib
Pajak, Sanksi Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor, dan Sistem Samsat Drive Thru terhadap
Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor. Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(1), 15–24.
Wardani, D. K., & Wati, E. (2018). Pengaruh Sosialisasi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib
Pajak dengan Pengetahuan Perpajakan sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Wajib
Pajak Orang Pribadi di KPP Pratama Kebumen). Nominal, Barometer Riset Akuntansi dan
Manajemen, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v7i1.19358
Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance:
The role of taxpayers’ identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629–645.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.629
Wujarso, R., Saprudin, & Napitupulu, R. D. (2020). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan dan
Sanksi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM Di Jakarta. Jurnal STEI Ekonomi,
29(02).
Xiong, W., Chen, B., Wang, H., & Zhu, D. (2019). Governing public–private partnerships: A
systematic review of case study literature. Australian Journal of Public Administration,
78(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12343
Yanti, D. N., Banuwa, I. S., Safe’i, R., Wulandari, C., & Gumay Febryano, I. (2017). Analisis
Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Hutan
Tanaman Rakyat pada KPH Gedong Wani. Jurnal Hutan Dan Masyarakat, 9(2), 61.
https://doi.org/10.24259/jhm.v9i2.2861
Yulianti, A., & Kurniawan, A. (2019). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Perpajakan dan Persepsi
Keadilan Terhadap Tingkat Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak melalui Kepercayaan. Jurnal Riset
Keuangan Dan Akuntansi, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/jrka.v5i1.1929

Leave a Reply