Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.
NEW PROPOSALS
[edit]Exoristinae subcategories
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Exoristinae stubs is currently large (823 articles), and some subcategories can easily be made from it:
Creating all three would bring the number in the Exoristinae category down to a more manageable 148 articles. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:32, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 19:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tachininae subcategories
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Very similar to the above - Category:Tachininae stubs is large (744 articles, with no articles sortable into its existing subcategories) and has some subcategories that can be made from it.
- Tachinini: 176 articles
- Leskiini: 83 articles
- Ernestiini: 62 articles
- Polideini: 54 articles (could be upmerged since it's close to 60, but not over 60)
Creating all of these subcategories would halve the size of the Tachininae category (from 744 to 369). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 15:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 19:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you recommend upmerging the Polideini one, or is 54 articles close enough to 60 that it can get its own subcategory? Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 22:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pinging @Pegship: see the above :] (not sure if you're subscribed to this discussion) Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, I missed that. I think it's close enough. Anyone else? Her Pegship (?) 18:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Pinging @Pegship: see the above :] (not sure if you're subscribed to this discussion) Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you recommend upmerging the Polideini one, or is 54 articles close enough to 60 that it can get its own subcategory? Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 22:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]